Democrashield.com


Why Are We Supposed To Trust These Guys With Health Care, Again? (UPDATED)

Republican Congressman–and former House Minority Whip–Roy Blunt says this about health care reform:

Well, you could certainly argue that government should have never have gotten in the health care business, and that might have been the best argument of all, to figure out how people could have had more access to a competitive marketplace.

Government did get into the health care business in a big way in 1965 with Medicare, and later with Medicaid, and government already distorts the marketplace.

That’s brilliant Republican policy for you: not only should we not reform health care, but we should eliminate government-provided forms of health care like Medicare and Medicaid.

Because eliminating Medicare and Medicaid is really going to fix the health care crisis, isn’t it?

UPDATE: And where can you get some of the best medical care in America?

At the government-funded Veterans Health Administration:

Yet here’s a curious fact that few conservatives or liberals know. Who do you think receives higher-quality health care. Medicare patients who are free to pick their own doctors and specialists? Or aging veterans stuck in those presumably filthy VA hospitals with their antiquated equipment, uncaring administrators, and incompetent staff? An answer came in 2003, when the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine published a study that compared veterans health facilities on 11 measures of quality with fee-for-service Medicare. On all 11 measures, the quality of care in veterans facilities proved to be “significantly better.”

Here’s another curious fact. The Annals of Internal Medicine recently published a study that compared veterans health facilities with commercial managed-care systems in their treatment of diabetes patients. In seven out of seven measures of quality, the VA provided better care.

[...]

But when it comes to health care, it’s a government bureaucracy that’s setting the standard for maintaining best practices while reducing costs, and it’s the private sector that’s lagging in quality. That unexpected reality needs examining if we’re to have any hope of understanding what’s wrong with America’s health-care system and how to fix it. It turns out that precisely because the VHA is a big, government-run system that has nearly a lifetime relationship with its patients, it has incentives for investing in quality and keeping its patients well–incentives that are lacking in for-profit medicine.

[Emphasis added]



CBO: Public Health Care Option Cheaper & Better Than Expected

HEALTH

Previously, the Congressional Budget Office released an analysis supposedly examining the Democratic health care reform proposal.  Their conclusions found the proposal would cost nearly $1 trillion and still leave millions of Americans uncovered.

But, as it turns out, the CBO’s analysis was flawed–it was based not on what the Democrats were proposing but on old, outdated information.  Conservatives, of course, jumped all over the CBO’s flawed analysis as proof that health care reform with a public option was untenable.

Well, the CBO just released an updated analysis–based on the plan Democrats are actually proposing–and guess what they found:

The plan carries a 10-year price tag of slightly over $600 billion, and would lead toward an estimated 97 percent of all Americans having coverage, according to the Congressional Budget Office, Sens. Edward M. Kennedy and Chris Dodd said in a letter to other members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. The AP obtained a copy.

[...]

The letter indicated the cost and coverage improvements resulted from two changes. The first calls for a government-run health insurance option to compete with private coverage plans, an option that has drawn intense opposition from Republicans.

[...]

Additionally, the revised proposal calls for a $750 annual fee on employers for each full-time worker not offered coverage through their job. The fee would be set at $375 for part-time workers. Companies with fewer than 25 employees would be exempt. The fee was forecast to generate $52 billion over 10 years, money the government would use to help provide subsidies to those who cannot afford insurance.

The same provision is also estimated to greatly reduce the number of workers whose employers would drop coverage, thus addressing a major concern noted by CBO when it reviewed the earlier proposals.

[...]

In their letter, Kennedy and Dodd said the Congressional Budget Office “has carefully reviewed our complete bill, and we are pleased to report that CBO has scored it at $611.4 billion over 10 years, with the new coverage provisions scored at $597 billion. …The completed bill virtually eliminates the dropping of currently covered employees from employer-sponsored health plans.

[Emphasis mine]

The crux of Republican opposition to health care reform are that it would cost huge amounts of money and it would (allegedly) drive private insurance out of business by causing a large amount of employers to dump their employees onto the public option.

But this new CBO analysis shows that both of those talking points are untrue.  The GOP now has no solid ground upon which to oppose health care reform beyond simple, craven, conservative obstruction.

In fact, the cost of health care reform is so low that we can already pay for it out of the funds allotted in Obama’s budget:

President Barack Obama’s first budget will seek $634 billion over 10 years as a down payment on health care reform, a senior administration official said Wednesday.

Down payment? The Democratic health care reform proposal is so good that the down payment is going to be the only payment.

Of course, Republicans will still obstruct the plan.  But with 60 Democrats in the Senate, the GOP will no longer be able to stand in the way of sensible, necessary health care reform.

Comments Off


Palinomics 101

Here’s a fun headline from The Huffington Post:

Palin: Obama Wants To “Control The People” With Bailout Money

According to the Governor of Alaska, the government is spending money on people in order to control them.

Of course, in Alaska every citizen gets an annual $1,000 check from the government courtesy of the Alaska Permanent Fund, which is fed by the state’s oil tax revenues.

So, according to Sarah Palin, it’s bad when the government spends money to create jobs, but it’s good when the government just cuts you a big fat check. And sending your citizens big fat checks courtesy of the government is somehow consistent with the Republican economic philosophy.

Sarah Palin 2012! Because consistency is for losers!

Comments Off


On Corporate Tax Cheats (UPDATED)

So today the Obama administration revealed their plan to close corporate tax loopholes and shutter offshore tax shelters in order to make it harder for American corporations to avoid paying their fair share in taxes. If implemented, the administration’s plan would generate $210 billion in additional tax revenue.

Conservatives are, of course, up in arms about this. Many of them are claiming that American corporations pay enough in taxes as it is and that tightening up tax laws could lead to American companies moving overseas to take advantage of comparatively lower corporate tax rates. In fact, many conservatives point to Ireland as one such country with a low corporate tax rate.

Let’s deal with the Ireland fallacy first, just because that’s a talking point that comes up pretty often. Even though Ireland has a lower corporate tax rate than the U.S., corporate tax revenue makes up a larger share of their GDP than it does for us. How is this? Well, Ireland doesn’t have all the tax loopholes that the U.S. has, making it harder for their corporations to avoid paying their taxes. Remember, politics doesn’t happen in a vacuum–part of the reason why our corporate tax rate is so high because companies use loopholes to avoid paying their fair share in taxes. In order to recoup the revenue we lose to offshore tax shelters and the such, we have to raise the corporate tax rate. As a corollary, if we closed the loopholes that allow offshore tax shelters to exist, we would be collecting more corporate tax revenue and thus could afford to cut the corporate tax rate without losing any revenue.

But I digress. More importantly, conservatives are being massive hypocrites in opposing the Obama administration’s plan. First, they raise fears that American companies–if pressured to pay the money they owe–may relocate overseas to more corporate-friendly locales. Yet, these are the same conservatives who supported free trade economic policies that led to millions of American jobs being shipped overseas. So conservatives apparently have no problem with a corporation shipping millions of good middle-class jobs overseas as long as that company can rent a room in the Caymans and claim to be incorporated in the U.S.

Second, Republicans have been attacking the Obama administration’s spending almost since day 1, even holding (sparsely-attended) protests to criticize his spending policies. Yet they oppose a plan that would recoup $210 billion dollars in additional revenue; go figure.

Third, conservatives railed against several Obama administration appointees for failing to pay their taxes on time–Tim Geithner and Tom Daschle come to mind–yet they have no problem with American corporations ducking their taxes and bilking the American people out of hundreds of billions of dollars a year.

This is the problem with the conservative outrage-a-day machine, though–they find something new to be mad about every day at the cost of contradicting themselves time and time again. This is why nobody takes the GOP seriously anymore–when you spend day after day scrounging for assorted reasons to attack your political opponents, you eventually lose all credibility. Plus, I don’t think that many people have all that much sympathy for corporations at the moment, particularly ones that abuse the tax system to avoid paying their fair share.

So I say, go Obama. Close the loopholes and get us the money we’re owed. $210 billion is nothing to sneeze at, and according to the laws of this country that money is rightfully owed to the American people. If our corporations don’t like it, they’re free to set up shop in Ireland, where none of these tax loopholes exist anyway.

UPDATE: Hypocrisy #4– conservatives complain about how complex the tax code is, but then turn around and say things like this:

[CNBC's Erin Burnett]: That’s right. Isn’t it your obligation in this country – there is a tax code for a reason, to take advantage of every bit of it you can and pay as little as you can.

The truth is, conservatives love the complicated tax code because it gives wealthy corporations loopholes they can use to avoid paying the taxes they owe.

But, you know, conservatives are right–let’s be more like Ireland. We can start by following President Obama’s lead and eliminating all the loopholes corporations use to avoid paying their taxes.

And since we’ll be collecting more corporate tax revenue as a result of closing those loopholes we can afford to lower the corporate tax rate while pulling in the same revenue we do now.

Of course, I won’t hold my breath waiting for the GOP to get on board with that plan…



GOP Rebrading Fail (UPDATED With More Fail)

This quote, from this past weekend’s GOP rebranding tour kickoff, is one of my favorite Republican quotes of all time:

[Republicans] are the party of the revolutionaries, [Democrats] are the party of the monarchists.

Let’s review Modern American History 101:

Our most recent Republican president was the son of a former Republican president, who himself was the son of a wealthy, well-connected Wall Street executive/United States Senator.

To contrast, our two most recent Democratic presidents were born into relative poverty and raised by single mothers, achieving success on their own without either inherited wealth or family connections to help them.

Oh, and that quote up there? That’s from former Massachusetts governor and Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who is the son of former Michigan governor and Republican presidential candidate George Romney.

And thus the GOP rebranding effort fails right out of the gate as Republicans try to defy reality itself.

Bonus amazing quote from former GOP Whip Roy Blunt:

Just because we’re in a situation now where we vote no doesn’t mean we are the ‘party of no’ or have no ideas

Actually, yes, that’s exactly what that means; when you oppose the President’s agenda at every turn and offer nothing but warmed-over half-cooked non-alternatives, that makes you the Party of No with no ideas.

UPDATE: More about the aforementioned GOP rebranding kickoff:

GOP holds “Outside the Beltway” rebranding event inside the beltway

As part of the Republican Party’s rebranding effort, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) hosted a National Council for a New America event at a pizza shop over the weekend. Roll Call reported, “Cantor said the idea of the road show is to gather ideas from outside the Beltway to shape the Republican agenda.”

[...]

At the risk of sounding picky, it’s probably worth noting that Republicans started gathering ideas “from outside the Beltway” at an event inside the Beltway.

A place called Pie-tanza, in an Arlington strip mall, hosted the event. Pie-tanza is just a few minutes from the Washington Golf and Country Club. Indeed, it’s only about six miles from Capitol Hill.

[Emphasis mine]

UPDATE II: Also, different event but same kind of fail:

GOP turns to Bush aides for advice

Republicans looking to recover from Bush-era defeats are turning to an unlikely source for advice: top aides to former President George W. Bush.

They really are out of ideas, aren’t they? Bush & co. drove the GOP into the ground but the only people they could think to ask for advice are Bush & co.

UPDATE III: Speaking of the usual suspects, guess who’s leading the aforementioned GOP rebranding effort:

[T]the House Minority Leader, the Minority Whip, the Senate Minority Leader and last year’s Republican presidential nominee[,] Mitt Romney (R), Bobby Jindal (R), Haley Barbour (R), John Cornyn (R), and … wait for it … Jeb Bush (R).

They’re calling themselves “The National Council for a New America.” Funny, they look and sound just like the old America that got whipped at the polls. Twice.

Comments Off


The Party Of Fail (UPDATED X2)

When Congress was debating the economic stimulus package a few months ago, the GOP turned into the party of Beavis and Butthead (as Paul Krugman put it), mocking parts of the bill they didn’t like without bothering to prove that those particular expenditures weren’t stimulus.

For instance, LA Gov. Bobby Jindal mocked funding for volcano monitoring, and the GOP had a good laugh about it–that is, until AK’s Mount Redoubt erupted and lives were saved thanks to those very volcano monitoring programs. Whoops.

In addition, Susan Collins, Arlen Specter and Karl Rove–among others–mocked funding for “pandemic flu preparations.” But, as it turns out, that $900 million would probably have come in pretty handy right now, considering that we’re on the brink of a pandemic flu outbreak. Oops.

And to top it all off, the GOP is filibustering Obama’s nominee to be Secretary of Health and Human Services, meaning that there’s nobody heading up that department even though we’re in the midst of a serious pandemic flu outbreak. Heckauva job, guys!

This is why the American people don’t trust Republicans anymore–even when they’re out of power, they’re still messing everything up. Hey guys–there’s a reason why Obama’s approval ratings are up there and your approval ratings are down here.

UPDATE: Of course, I log onto my favorite right-wing blogs this morning and they’re all playing the same tune– something along the lines of “Liberals are saying swine flu is all the evil GOP’s fault!”

No, we’re not saying the outbreak of the swine flu is your fault. We’re saying that we could have done more to prepare for a pandemic flu scenario–in fact, were going to do more to prepare for it–except you all kept whining about the cost.

And we’re criticizing you for filibustering the nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services because you dislike her position on abortion, since we really, really could use a Secretary of Health and Human Services right now.

So no, nobody’s saying the flu outbreak is your fault. But we are criticizing you for sitting there and playing politics while we’ve been trying to prepare for something like this.

Our country is dealing with some major problems right now. Either grow up and help us fix them or get out of the way and let us take care of things. Once again, Republican obstinace is causing major problems and it’s getting really, really tiring.

UPDATE II: And Chuck Schumer, my former Senator, deserves criticism for this:

All those little porky things that the House put in, the money for the [National] Mall or the sexually transmitted diseases or the flu pandemic, they’re all out.

Bad call, in retrospect.

Of course, there wouldn’t have been an impetus for lawmakers to strip out expenditures for things such as pandemic flu preparation if the right hadn’t spent weeks screaming at the top of their lungs, calling the stimulus package things like “spendulus,” “porkulus,” and “the generational theft act of 2009″ and pushing lawmakers to strip out as many expenditures as possible.

But since the right can’t take responsibility for anything, the right will just keep gibbering that “Chuckie Schumer opposed pandemic flu funding, too!!”

Because politics always happens completely within a vacuum, right?

Comments Off


What’s Good For The Goose…

The Dow Jones grew nearly 6% today, gaining 379.44 points to close at 6,296.49.

According to Republican logic, President Obama is singlehandedly responsible for today’s rally.  Thanks, President Obama!

…yes, it’s rediculous, but I didn’t write these rules–if conservatives are going to hold the President responsible for every dip in the stock market, they have to then give him credit for every increase.  Personally, I’m going to attribute today’s rally to the introduction of the Employee Free Choice Act into Congress.

Comments Off


Voice Of Reason

Ladies and Gentlemen, Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, quite possibly the only sane Republican left in America:

LaHood, one of the few Republican members of the Obama administration, scoffed at the recent talking points emanating from the congressional leaders of his own party. His voice rising at times with emotion, the transportation czar tackled first the notion that the president was a socialist in disguise.

“I don’t agree with it,” LaHood said. “If you go out and interview these people working on this road in Maryland… these people are thrilled. They are thrilled that they are working in March on a good paying job building roads, which is what they were trained to do. That’s going to be happening all over America. So the idea that this is socialism — it is not socialism, it is economic development. It is going to provide an economic engine around communities all over American for jobs; good paying jobs; and help people pay their bills. I don’t call that socialism…”

[Emphasis mine]

Of course, I’m sure Secretary LaHood knows as well I do that the Republicans don’t actually believe most of the things they say, but they have to try to score political points somehow, right?

Comments Off


Freudian Slip

Republican Congressman Patrick McHenry lets slip the GOP’s real goal:

“We will lose on legislation. But we will win the message war every day, and every week, until November 2010…our goal is to bring down approval numbers for Pelosi and for House Democrats. That will take repetition. This is a marathon, not a sprint.”

That’s right–the Republican Party’s priority isn’t fixing the economic crisis.  It’s not creating jobs or growing the economy.  It’s not getting our troops safely out of Iraq or helping them to succeed in Afghanistan.  It’s not reforming our health care system or ensuring that Social Security and Medicare remain strong.  It’s not helping hard working families keep their homes or afford to send their kids to college.

No, the Republican Party’s #1 priority is hurting the Democrats’ approval ratings; their only goal is regaining political power.

This is why the GOP is–and should remain–in the minority.  They’ve become so obsessed with politicking that they don’t remember what they were elected to do in the first place; they can’t look at anything outside of whether or not it’s politically advantageous to them.  While the adults work to clean up the messes the Republicans made, all the Republicans can think about is how they can start making more messes.

Every Democrat in the country should have Rep. McHenry’s words memorized–the American people need to be constantly reminded of just how frivolous and unserious the Republican Party has become.

Comments Off


‘It’s All Barack Obama’s Fault!’

Back during the ‘90’s, when our economy was growing like never before, Republicans attributed that economic growth to Reagan, not Clinton–according to them, the performance of the economy had nothing to do with the occupant of the White House at the time, even several years into his administration.

Similarly, when George Bush took office and a recession began soon after, Republicans claimed the bad economy had nothing to do with Bush—they claimed that he had “inherited” the “Clinton recession” (even though the recession began months after Bush took office). Again, conservatives claimed that the economy had nothing to do with the guy in the White House, even a substantial amount of time into his Presidency.

But now, in the Grand Old Hypocrite fashion, less than two months into his presidency, conservatives are saying that Barack Obama owns the economy. According to them, every economic problem is Obama’s, George Bush had nothing to do with it, and Obama’s failure to fix in 8 weeks days what the Republicans took 8 years to destroy proves that Obama is a poor president.

(Hell, some conservatives are even looking at the decline of the economy since Election Day, as if Barack Obama was responsible for how the economy performed months before he even took office.)

I just don’t get how some on the right can be so shameless. To assert—contrary to reality itself—that good economies are always created by Republicans and bad economies are always created by Democrats, regardless of who is in the White House or what policies they have implemented, just doesn’t make any sense. Conservatives have elevated blame-shifting and buck-passing to an art form in their latest machinations to avoid taking blame for the ruinous economy they created.

Comments Off


The Era Of Big Government…

…is popular:

Seventy-two percent of those questioned in recent CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey say they favor increasing the federal government’s influence over the country’s health care system in an attempt to lower costs and provide health care coverage to more Americans, with 27 percent opposing such a move. Other recent polls show six in 10 think the government should provide health insurance or take responsibility for providing health care to all Americans.

[Emphasis mine]

So all of the right-wing hysterics about “socialism” and the “Eurofication of America” and “Big Government” has been worth absolutely nothing.

The American people know we’re facing a health care crisis and they know that–contrary to GOP boilerplate–right now America doesn’t have the best health care system in the world. But they also know that we could have the best health care system in the world if we simply built it.

What this tells us is that the right-wing hyperbole and over-the-top rhetoric isn’t having any effect anymore. The louder they complain about President Obama’s policies, the more popular they get; it’s almost as if there’s an indirectly proportionate relationship between Republican opposition and public support. I’m not sure Republicans even realize just how unpopular they are. To wit:

Do you support or oppose raising taxes on households earning over $250,000 a year and, at the same time, lowering taxes for most other households?Support 66
Oppose 33

And:

“What do you think the nation’s economy needs more of right now — the economic policies of Ronald Reagan or the economic policies of Barack Obama?”Obama 49%
Reagan 40%

Obama is bigger than Reagan, and Republicans are on the absolute wrong side of history right now.

Comments Off


Stupid Republican Tricks: Stock Market Edition

Here are some rules from Conservativeland when it comes to economic policy and the stock market:

  • The stock market reacts to the news coming out of Washington and nothing else.  If the market is going down, it’s because the entire financial sector disapproves of Washington’s economic policies.
  • Subsequently, the President of the United States is singlehandedly responsible for the performance of the stock market. There is a direct correlation between the President’s speeches/actions on any given day and how the stock market performs on that day.
  • The stock market is the only worthwhile measure of economic success. No other factor (the unemployment rate, inflation, GDP growth/loss, etc.) is even worth measuring or considering.

Now that a Democrat is in the White House, those are the rules governing how Republicans talk about the economy.  Kinda ridiculous when you actually sit down and spell them out, aren’t they?

Comments Off


The Boy Who Cried “Pork”

Ever since Barack Obama moved into the White House, it seems like conservatives have found themselves a brand new buzzword: “pork.” The economic stimulus package? “Pork.” The omnibus spending bill? “More pork!” The 2009 budget? “Chock full of pork!” Everywhere you turn, conservatives are crying pork.

Problem is, the spending in those bills isn’t pork. And by calling everything “pork,” conservatives are cheapening criticism of actually wasteful government spending.

“Pork” is a shortened version of “pork-barrel spending,” which refers to tax money that individual lawmakers secure for projects in their district. Usually the expenditure isn’t particularly necessary but lawmakers push for it so they can brag about bringing home the bacon come election season.

Now, though, conservatives are redefining “pork” as any government spending they just don’t like, with no regard toward who secured it, why, or what the actual benefits of that spending may be. And it’s not even a catchall term used for wasteful spending; there’s plenty of wasteful spending at the DoD that you’ll never hear conservatives refer to as “pork,” even though it’s far closer to the actual definition of the word than other expenditures they tar with that label.

And by painting all government spending by a Democratic administration as wasteful, conservatives are cheapening criticism of actual government waste. If you decide that every dollar the government spends while a Democrat is in the White House is “pork,” then the term starts to lose all meaning.

The right’s crying-pork schtick is getting old as it is; after four-to-eight of spending bills and budgets being relentlessly attacked as “pork” by conservatives, the public is going to be nearly deaf to criticisms of wasteful spending, legitimate or not.

Learn to pick your battles.  A single egregious example of waste can be a more powerful symbol than a long bulleted list of programs that sound kinda wonky but don’t really seem all that bad (just look at the “bridge to nowhere” controversy for a good example).



On Deficits And Popularity

Lately, I’ve been thinking about the well-funded tea partay movement being set up on the right.  Republicans seem to believe that, by focusing on the deficit and the national debt, they’re going to be able to win back support and retake the majority.  Of course, that’s if you assume that we’re all going to forget that it was Republican policies and a Republican President who necessitated that we spend so much money to bail out economy out in the first place.

But, honestly, are debts and the deficit that big of an issue? I don’t think so. First, the last the America wasn’t in debt was during Andrew Jackson’s administration.  People are used to the nation being in some astronomical amount of debt measured in larger amounts of money than most people could even imagine.  And even though partisans love to talk about how every man, woman and child in America owes [insert huge amount of money here] to pay off the national debt (and that’s people on both sides–I’m sure I’ve made that argument at some point myself), it’s a very weak argument.  See, nobody ever shows up and demands you fork over that huge amount of money.  Even when we are paying off the debt, that money comes from the taxes we’re all paying anyway.

Plus, the debt doesn’t have an impact on our daily lives.  And usually the reason America gets into more debt is economic troubles–i.e., things such as unemployment, inflation, etc. that do affect people’s lives.  For most people, then, racking up a bigger deficit to fix the economy is creating a very, very distant problem in order to fix a very, very immediate problem, and most people probably don’t mind a larger debt if it means they can feel secure that they won’t lose their job/house/health care.

Heck, if you want an example of America’s political apathy toward the national debt, look no further than Ronald Reagan himself.  Remember, Reagan tripled the national deficit during his years in office, yet he has become (particularly by supposedly deficit-hating Republicans) one of America’s top-rated former Presidents ever.

Just for kicks, here’s a graph:

debtg1

Now who’s remembered for having a better economy, Carter or Reagan? Reagan, of course.  But in terms of the national debt, Carter was better.  Does that change his legacy? No, nor should it.  It just illustrates that the national debt is not really a means by which the people judge economic success or failure.

Of course, debts matter–that money has to be paid off sometime by someone.  But the question isn’t always just how much money we’re spending, but what we get in return for that spending.  If we put our country in more debt now in order to grow the economy out of further debts later, is that investment worth it? Reagan tripled the national debt and yet, a little more than 10 years after he took office, our economy was ruined once again.  In light of that, it’s hard to imagine that all the right-wing carping about our current debts is going to cause any harm at all to the Obama administration.

Comments Off


GOP Math Fail

Conservatives have been circulating this graph recently in order to allege that President Obama is singularly responsible for racking up huge deficits, larger even than the record-breaking deficits America incurred under George W. Bush:

deficit-graph

Of course, there’s one sentence on that graph conservatives like to either ignore or cover up, and that’s the “Note: Fiscal year ends Sept. 30.”

See, debts aren’t measured by calendar years (which goes from January 1 to December 31); they’re measured by fiscal years, which go from October 1 to September 30.  So the 2009 fiscal year started on October 1, 2008–just two weeks after the economic collapse and long before the Bush-sponsored TARP program made it through Congress.

George W. Bush was in office for only 20 days of calendar year 2009, but he was in office for four months of fiscal year 2009; he bears a larger responsibility for that huge debt up there than most conservatives would have you believe.

And, of course, it’s ridiculous for conservatives to complain about deficits at all considering that George Bush spent years setting record-breaking deficits–after inheriting a rec0rd-breaking surplus–and managed to double the national debt during his 8 years in office.

But you know what they say, it’s okay if you’re a Republican.

Comments Off


Tea Partay (UPDATED)

Today is the day of the glorious hip-GOP tea partay. Change is coming, America, and these guys are going to bring it:

So, what are these protests going to accomplish besides making a bunch of out-of-power Republicans feel better about being hugely unpopular?

…yeah, that’s what I figured.

UPDATE: And in case anyone actually believes the Tea Partays are some kind of spontaneous taxpayer revolt, here are the folks who are organizing and bankrolling them (according to the Tea Partay’s very own website, newamericanteaparty.com):

the American Spectator, the Heartland Institute, Americans for Tax Reform, the National Taxpayers Union, Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks, the Institute for Liberty, the Coalition for a Conservative Majority and the Young Conservatives Coalition.

So this is a joint effort between the who’s who of the conservative movement and a who’s who of right-wing bloggers.

In other words, conservative activists are protesting a Democratically-proposed bill that was passed by a Democratic Congress and signed into law by a Democratic President. And this is notable/surprising/newsworthy…how?

Oh right, it isn’t.  Progressives opposed Bush and conservatives oppose Obama; this isn’t some kind of groundbreaking, revolutionary movement; it’s politics as usual.  Even worse for conservatives, it’s the same kind of navel-gazing gimmickry that helped put them in the minority in the first place.

Someone needs to teach these guys history. The Boston Tea Party actually accomplished something; these Tea Partays are just down-on-their-luck conservatives trying to pretend they’re still relevant.

Comments Off


Biting The Hand That Feeds You

Gail Collins:

Louisiana has gotten $130 billion in post-Katrina aid. How is it that the stars of the Republican austerity movement come from the states that suck up the most federal money? Taxpayers in New York send way more to Washington than they get back so more can go to places like Alaska and Louisiana. Which is fine, as long as we don’t have to hear their governors bragging about how the folks who elected them want to keep their tax money to themselves. Of course they do! That’s because they’re living off ours.

Here are the top ten states that receive the most federal tax money per every dollar they pay, color-coded by how they voted in the 2008 Presidential election:

  1. New Mexico
  2. Mississippi
  3. Alaska
  4. Louisiana
  5. West Virginia
  6. North Dakota
  7. Alabama
  8. South Dakota
  9. Kentucky
  10. Virginia

Here are the top ten states that receive the least federal tax money per every dollar they pay, color-coded by how they voted in the 2008 Presidential election:

  1. New Jersey
  2. Nevada
  3. Connecticut
  4. New Hampshire
  5. Minnesota
  6. Illinois
  7. Delaware
  8. California
  9. New York
  10. Colorado

[Source]

So, if we actually listened to Republicans and cut federal taxes, the Republican-voting red states  would be hurt the most.  Turns out that the GOP’s grandstanding on taxes is nothing more than hot air–they have no problem railing against high taxes while simultaneously taking tax dollars hand-over-fist from blue states.

Comments Off


Gimmickry

Conservative blogger Patrick Ruffini discusses Sam “Joe the Plumber” Wurzelbacher:

Joe the Plumber — a one or two day campaign gimmick — has become a poster boy for conservatism. To say that the McCain campaign milked Joe Wurzelbacher’s story and then some would be the understatement of the century. Now, conservatives are making him a foreign war correspondent and he is sure to be feted at CPAC — so I’m sure to get a certain amount of grief for what I’m writing now.

If you want to get a sense of how unserious and ungrounded most Americans think the Republican Party is, look no further than how conservatives elevate Joe the Plumber as a spokesman. The movement has become so gimmick-driven that Wurzelbacher will be a conservative hero long after people have forgotten what his legitimate policy beef with Obama was.

I think “gimmick-driven” is, quite possibly, the most astute criticism of the Republican Party I have ever heard.

Remember when John McCain “suspended” his Presidential campaign to fly to Washington and fix the economic crisis? Remember when McCain chose Sarah Palin to be his running mate?

Remember the GOP’s response to the economic stimulus package, which turned into a never-ending circus of embarrassing political gimmicks? Republican lawmakers complained about how many pages the bill was, even though—obviously—the length of a bill has no impact whatsoever on whether or not it’s a good piece of legislation. They complained about the cost of the bill, which would have been a worthy criticism had they not made it in the stupidest way possible, gabbing on about how high a stack of 1 trillion $1 bills would reach or how, if you spent a million dollars a day since the birth of Jesus, you wouldn’t spend as much money as was contained in that bill.

Yes, the stimulus bill had a big price tag, but nobody was trying to hide it. President Obama and the Democrats said from the start that we needed a large stimulus package; it wasn’t like everyone needed the GOP to tell them what the bill cost.

The sheer cost of the bill wasn’t important; what was important was the return on investment, how much economic growth that money would create. In the end, the GOP gave no coherent, worthwhile reason to oppose the bill. Where was their economics?

The list of gimmicks goes on and on: embracing Twitter as quick-fix to their poor messaging, hosting pointless “tea parties,” forcing a Michael Steele hip-GOP image makeover, etc. The right is hoping they’ll stumble across a magic bullet that will rocket them back into the majority, which is the kind of short-sighted, shallow thinking that’s going to keep them in the minority.

As Ruffini says,

Conservatives should not need Joe the Plumber to prove their middle class bona fides. We are naturally the party of the middle, and we don’t need gimmicks to prove it.

I agree with part of Ruffini’s point–the GOP shouldn’t need gimmicks, their policies should  be able to speak for themselves.  For instance, picking a random middle-class person to read your talking points doesn’t prove you’re the party of the middle class; embracing policies that help the middle class prove you’re the party of the middle class.

Somewhere along the way, Republicans forgot that the underpinning of politics is policy and they jettisoned political substance in favor of whatever stunt they hope will win the day’s news cycle.  Getting the conservative movement to kick it’s gimmickry habit and getting them to be serious once again should be the first step toward any kind of Republican revival.



$2 Trillion Over 10 Years

That’s how much money President Obama’s budget will save the American people:

With its new budget due Thursday, the White House is promising $2 trillion in 10-year savings, with an estimated $635 billion held in reserve as a down payment toward President Barack Obama’s pledge of health care reform.

[...]

Obama’s focus on high-end taxpayers is consistent with his larger philosophy — both in taxes and spending. In the case of agriculture subsidies, for example, the budget is also expected to limit government payments to farms earning more than $500,000. At the same time the president would extend his payroll tax break — most beneficial for working class families — while collecting more revenue by allowing some of the Bush-era tax breaks for the wealthy expire.

$2 trillion. That’s nearly enough to pay off the Wall Street bailout ($700 billion), the economic stimulus package ($800 billion) and the foundation of a universal health care program. All of those things will be paid for through good old-fashioned fiscal responsibility.

So it turns out that all the Republican complaining about the high cost of the stimulus package, calling it “generational theft” and whatnot, was just so much hot air.

Comments Off


Pork!

Remember the weeks-long Republican campaign to derail the economic stimulus package? Remember all the ranting about “pork” and complaining about “wasteful spending dressed in ’stimulus’ clothes“? Remember the Republicans complaining that it was”generational theft“  “larded up with wasteful spending“?

Well, turns out the Republicans have no problem with wasteful spending when it benefits them:

A ten percent increase in the budget for Congressional operations was needed because Senate Republicans wanted to retain previous staff levels despite having lost roughly 20 percent of their ranks in the 2008 elections, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said Wednesday.

[...]

Reid, asked about the increase at a press conference, initially dodged the question, speaking instead about spending in general.

The unsatisfied reporter repeated the question about a ten percent raise for the congressional budget. “How is that going to help get out of the depression?” she pressed.

Don’t blame us, said Reid.

“We had a situation — you should direct that question to Senator McConnell,” he said, referring to the Senate Minority Leader, “because we had trouble organizing this year. He wanted to maintain a lot of their staffing even though they had lost huge numbers. And the only way we could get it done is to do what we did. So you should direct that question to Senator McConnell.”

A McConnell spokesman didn’t immediately return a phone call.

Oh, the hypocrisy.

So, according to Republican logic, spending money to help the American people through an economic crisis is wasteful pork that should be opposed at all costs, yet spending a couple billion dollars to give Congressional Republicans bigger staffs is a completely worthwhile and necessary expense.

When it comes to helping you, the GOP is the Party of No.  But when it comes to helping themselves, the GOP is the Party of Gimmie Gimmie Gimmie. ‘Let them eat cake’ indeed.

Comments Off


Obama: 1, Jindal: 0

President Obama hit it out of the park last night. And don’t take my word for it–just listen to the American people:

CNN

The economic plan Obama outlined tonight: 82% SUPPORT / 17% OPPOSE

Reaction to Obama’s speech: 68% VERY POSITIVE / 24% SOMEWHAT POSITIVE / 8% NEGATIVE

And:

CBS

The stimulus is going to help me.

Before Obama’s speech: 62% AGREE

After Obama’s speech: 79% AGREE

As for Bobby Jindal’s response, well, is there a worse word than ‘terrible’?

His delivery was atrocious–Jindal came off as condescending, like he was speaking to a class of elementary school students instead of the American people. It was hard to even focus on what he was saying through the smugness.

More importantly, the content of his speech was abysmal. Democrats and Republicans might disagree on what the federal government should do to fix this economic crisis, but saying that the federal government should nothing is stupid at best and nihilistic at worse.

And the way Jindal invoked Hurricane Katrina was just appalling:

Today in Washington, some are promising that government will rescue us from the economic storms raging all around us.

Those of us who lived through Hurricane Katrina, we have our doubts.

Who was in charge of the federal government when Hurricane Katrina happened? Republicans. The poor response to Hurricane Katrina wasn’t a bad reflection on governance itself; it was a bad reflection on Republican governance. Invoking one of the GOP’s biggest failures of leadership during a crisis isn’t exactly the best way to restore people’s faith in Republican leadership during a crisis.

Honestly, never have I seen a rising star fall so fast.  The GOP built huge amounts of hype up around Bobby Jindal, yet he ended up falling far short of anyone’s expectations.



President Obama’s Speech To The Nation (UPDATED)

Here is the full text of President Barack Obama’s speech to be delivered this evening before a joint session of Congress:

Remarks of President Barack Obama – As Prepared for Delivery

Address to Joint Session of Congress

Tuesday, February 24th, 2009

Madame Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, and the First Lady of the United States:

I’ve come here tonight not only to address the distinguished men and women in this great chamber, but to speak frankly and directly to the men and women who sent us here.

I know that for many Americans watching right now, the state of our economy is a concern that rises above all others. And rightly so. If you haven’t been personally affected by this recession, you probably know someone who has – a friend; a neighbor; a member of your family. You don’t need to hear another list of statistics to know that our economy is in crisis, because you live it every day. It’s the worry you wake up with and the source of sleepless nights. It’s the job you thought you’d retire from but now have lost; the business you built your dreams upon that’s now hanging by a thread; the college acceptance letter your child had to put back in the envelope. The impact of this recession is real, and it is everywhere.

But while our economy may be weakened and our confidence shaken; though we are living through difficult and uncertain times, tonight I want every American to know this:

We will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before.

The weight of this crisis will not determine the destiny of this nation. The answers to our problems don’t lie beyond our reach. They exist in our laboratories and universities; in our fields and our factories; in the imaginations of our entrepreneurs and the pride of the hardest-working people on Earth. Those qualities that have made America the greatest force of progress and prosperity in human history we still possess in ample measure. What is required now is for this country to pull together, confront boldly the challenges we face, and take responsibility for our future once more

Now, if we’re honest with ourselves, we’ll admit that for too long, we have not always met these responsibilities – as a government or as a people. I say this not to lay blame or look backwards, but because it is only by understanding how we arrived at this moment that we’ll be able to lift ourselves out of this predicament.

The fact is, our economy did not fall into decline overnight. Nor did all of our problems begin when the housing market collapsed or the stock market sank. We have known for decades that our survival depends on finding new sources of energy. Yet we import more oil today than ever before. The cost of health care eats up more and more of our savings each year, yet we keep delaying reform. Our children will compete for jobs in a global economy that too many of our schools do not prepare them for. And though all these challenges went unsolved, we still managed to spend more money and pile up more debt, both as individuals and through our government, than ever before.

In other words, we have lived through an era where too often, short-term gains were prized over long-term prosperity; where we failed to look beyond the next payment, the next quarter, or the next election. A surplus became an excuse to transfer wealth to the wealthy instead of an opportunity to invest in our future. Regulations were gutted for the sake of a quick profit at the expense of a healthy market. People bought homes they knew they couldn’t afford from banks and lenders who pushed those bad loans anyway. And all the while, critical debates and difficult decisions were put off for some other time on some other day.

Well that day of reckoning has arrived, and the time to take charge of our future is here.

Now is the time to act boldly and wisely – to not only revive this economy, but to build a new foundation for lasting prosperity. Now is the time to jumpstart job creation, re-start lending, and invest in areas like energy, health care, and education that will grow our economy, even as we make hard choices to bring our deficit down. That is what my economic agenda is designed to do, and that’s what I’d like to talk to you about tonight.

It’s an agenda that begins with jobs.

As soon as I took office, I asked this Congress to send me a recovery plan by President’s Day that would put people back to work and put money in their pockets. Not because I believe in bigger government – I don’t. Not because I’m not mindful of the massive debt we’ve inherited – I am. I called for action because the failure to do so would have cost more jobs and caused more hardships. In fact, a failure to act would have worsened our long-term deficit by assuring weak economic growth for years. That’s why I pushed for quick action. And tonight, I am grateful that this Congress delivered, and pleased to say that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is now law.

Over the next two years, this plan will save or create 3.5 million jobs. More than 90% of these jobs will be in the private sector – jobs rebuilding our roads and bridges; constructing wind turbines and solar panels; laying broadband and expanding mass transit.

Because of this plan, there are teachers who can now keep their jobs and educate our kids. Health care professionals can continue caring for our sick. There are 57 police officers who are still on the streets of Minneapolis tonight because this plan prevented the layoffs their department was about to make.

Because of this plan, 95% of the working households in America will receive a tax cut – a tax cut that you will see in your paychecks beginning on April 1st.

Because of this plan, families who are struggling to pay tuition costs will receive a $2,500 tax credit for all four years of college. And Americans who have lost their jobs in this recession will be able to receive extended unemployment benefits and continued health care coverage to help them weather this storm.

I know there are some in this chamber and watching at home who are skeptical of whether this plan will work. I understand that skepticism. Here in Washington, we’ve all seen how quickly good intentions can turn into broken promises and wasteful spending. And with a plan of this scale comes enormous responsibility to get it right.

That is why I have asked Vice President Biden to lead a tough, unprecedented oversight effort – because nobody messes with Joe. I have told each member of my Cabinet as well as mayors and governors across the country that they will be held accountable by me and the American people for every dollar they spend. I have appointed a proven and aggressive Inspector General to ferret out any and all cases of waste and fraud. And we have created a new website called recovery.gov so that every American can find out how and where their money is being spent.

So the recovery plan we passed is the first step in getting our economy back on track. But it is just the first step. Because even if we manage this plan flawlessly, there will be no real recovery unless we clean up the credit crisis that has severely weakened our financial system.

I want to speak plainly and candidly about this issue tonight, because every American should know that it directly affects you and your family’s well-being. You should also know that the money you’ve deposited in banks across the country is safe; your insurance is secure; and you can rely on the continued operation of our financial system. That is not the source of concern.

The concern is that if we do not re-start lending in this country, our recovery will be choked off before it even begins.

You see, the flow of credit is the lifeblood of our economy. The ability to get a loan is how you finance the purchase of everything from a home to a car to a college education; how stores stock their shelves, farms buy equipment, and businesses make payroll.

But credit has stopped flowing the way it should. Too many bad loans from the housing crisis have made their way onto the books of too many banks. With so much debt and so little confidence, these banks are now fearful of lending out any more money to households, to businesses, or to each other. When there is no lending, families can’t afford to buy homes or cars. So businesses are forced to make layoffs. Our economy suffers even more, and credit dries up even further

That is why this administration is moving swiftly and aggressively to break this destructive cycle, restore confidence, and re-start lending.

We will do so in several ways. First, we are creating a new lending fund that represents the largest effort ever to help provide auto loans, college loans, and small business loans to the consumers and entrepreneurs who keep this economy running.

Second, we have launched a housing plan that will help responsible families facing the threat of foreclosure lower their monthly payments and re-finance their mortgages. It’s a plan that won’t help speculators or that neighbor down the street who bought a house he could never hope to afford, but it will help millions of Americans who are struggling with declining home values – Americans who will now be able to take advantage of the lower interest rates that this plan has already helped bring about. In fact, the average family who re-finances today can save nearly $2000 per year on their mortgage.

Third, we will act with the full force of the federal government to ensure that the major banks that Americans depend on have enough confidence and enough money to lend even in more difficult times. And when we learn that a major bank has serious problems, we will hold accountable those responsible, force the necessary adjustments, provide the support to clean up their balance sheets, and assure the continuity of a strong, viable institution that can serve our people and our economy.

I understand that on any given day, Wall Street may be more comforted by an approach that gives banks bailouts with no strings attached, and that holds nobody accountable for their reckless decisions. But such an approach won’t solve the problem. And our goal is to quicken the day when we re-start lending to the American people and American business and end this crisis once and for all.

I intend to hold these banks fully accountable for the assistance they receive, and this time, they will have to clearly demonstrate how taxpayer dollars result in more lending for the American taxpayer. This time, CEOs won’t be able to use taxpayer money to pad their paychecks or buy fancy drapes or disappear on a private jet. Those days are over.

Still, this plan will require significant resources from the federal government – and yes, probably more than we’ve already set aside. But while the cost of action will be great, I can assure you that the cost of inaction will be far greater, for it could result in an economy that sputters along for not months or years, but perhaps a decade. That would be worse for our deficit, worse for business, worse for you, and worse for the next generation. And I refuse to let that happen.

I understand that when the last administration asked this Congress to provide assistance for struggling banks, Democrats and Republicans alike were infuriated by the mismanagement and results that followed. So were the American taxpayers. So was I.

So I know how unpopular it is to be seen as helping banks right now, especially when everyone is suffering in part from their bad decisions. I promise you – I get it.

But I also know that in a time of crisis, we cannot afford to govern out of anger, or yield to the politics of the moment. My job – our job – is to solve the problem. Our job is to govern with a sense of responsibility. I will not spend a single penny for the purpose of rewarding a single Wall Street executive, but I will do whatever it takes to help the small business that can’t pay its workers or the family that has saved and still can’t get a mortgage.

That’s what this is about. It’s not about helping banks – it’s about helping people. Because when credit is available again, that young family can finally buy a new home. And then some company will hire workers to build it. And then those workers will have money to spend, and if they can get a loan too, maybe they’ll finally buy that car, or open their own business. Investors will return to the market, and American families will see their retirement secured once more. Slowly, but surely, confidence will return, and our economy will recover.

So I ask this Congress to join me in doing whatever proves necessary. Because we cannot consign our nation to an open-ended recession. And to ensure that a crisis of this magnitude never happens again, I ask Congress to move quickly on legislation that will finally reform our outdated regulatory system. It is time to put in place tough, new common-sense rules of the road so that our financial market rewards drive and innovation, and punishes short-cuts and abuse.

The recovery plan and the financial stability plan are the immediate steps we’re taking to revive our economy in the short-term. But the only way to fully restore America’s economic strength is to make the long-term investments that will lead to new jobs, new industries, and a renewed ability to compete with the rest of the world. The only way this century will be another American century is if we confront at last the price of our dependence on oil and the high cost of health care; the schools that aren’t preparing our children and the mountain of debt they stand to inherit. That is our responsibility.

In the next few days, I will submit a budget to Congress. So often, we have come to view these documents as simply numbers on a page or laundry lists of programs. I see this document differently. I see it as a vision for America – as a blueprint for our future.

My budget does not attempt to solve every problem or address every issue. It reflects the stark reality of what we’ve inherited – a trillion dollar deficit, a financial crisis, and a costly recession.

Given these realities, everyone in this chamber – Democrats and Republicans – will have to sacrifice some worthy priorities for which there are no dollars. And that includes me.

But that does not mean we can afford to ignore our long-term challenges. I reject the view that says our problems will simply take care of themselves; that says government has no role in laying the foundation for our common prosperity.

For history tells a different story. History reminds us that at every moment of economic upheaval and transformation, this nation has responded with bold action and big ideas. In the midst of civil war, we laid railroad tracks from one coast to another that spurred commerce and industry. From the turmoil of the Industrial Revolution came a system of public high schools that prepared our citizens for a new age. In the wake of war and depression, the GI Bill sent a generation to college and created the largest middle-class in history. And a twilight struggle for freedom led to a nation of highways, an American on the moon, and an explosion of technology that still shapes our world.

In each case, government didn’t supplant private enterprise; it catalyzed private enterprise. It created the conditions for thousands of entrepreneurs and new businesses to adapt and to thrive.

We are a nation that has seen promise amid peril, and claimed opportunity from ordeal. Now we must be that nation again. That is why, even as it cuts back on the programs we don’t need, the budget I submit will invest in the three areas that are absolutely critical to our economic future: energy, health care, and education.

It begins with energy.

We know the country that harnesses the power of clean, renewable energy will lead the 21st century. And yet, it is China that has launched the largest effort in history to make their economy energy efficient. We invented solar technology, but we’ve fallen behind countries like Germany and Japan in producing it. New plug-in hybrids roll off our assembly lines, but they will run on batteries made in Korea.

Well I do not accept a future where the jobs and industries of tomorrow take root beyond our borders – and I know you don’t either. It is time for America to lead again.

Thanks to our recovery plan, we will double this nation’s supply of renewable energy in the next three years. We have also made the largest investment in basic research funding in American history – an investment that will spur not only new discoveries in energy, but breakthroughs in medicine, science, and technology.

We will soon lay down thousands of miles of power lines that can carry new energy to cities and towns across this country. And we will put Americans to work making our homes and buildings more efficient so that we can save billions of dollars on our energy bills.

But to truly transform our economy, protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy. So I ask this Congress to send me legislation that places a market-based cap on carbon pollution and drives the production of more renewable energy in America. And to support that innovation, we will invest fifteen billion dollars a year to develop technologies like wind power and solar power; advanced biofuels, clean coal, and more fuel-efficient cars and trucks built right here in America.

As for our auto industry, everyone recognizes that years of bad decision-making and a global recession have pushed our automakers to the brink. We should not, and will not, protect them from their own bad practices. But we are committed to the goal of a re-tooled, re-imagined auto industry that can compete and win. Millions of jobs depend on it. Scores of communities depend on it. And I believe the nation that invented the automobile cannot walk away from it.

None of this will come without cost, nor will it be easy. But this is America. We don’t do what’s easy. We do what is necessary to move this country forward.

For that same reason, we must also address the crushing cost of health care.

This is a cost that now causes a bankruptcy in America every thirty seconds. By the end of the year, it could cause 1.5 million Americans to lose their homes. In the last eight years, premiums have grown four times faster than wages. And in each of these years, one million more Americans have lost their health insurance. It is one of the major reasons why small businesses close their doors and corporations ship jobs overseas. And it’s one of the largest and fastest-growing parts of our budget.

Given these facts, we can no longer afford to put health care reform on hold.

Already, we have done more to advance the cause of health care reform in the last thirty days than we have in the last decade. When it was days old, this Congress passed a law to provide and protect health insurance for eleven million American children whose parents work full-time. Our recovery plan will invest in electronic health records and new technology that will reduce errors, bring down costs, ensure privacy, and save lives. It will launch a new effort to conquer a disease that has touched the life of nearly every American by seeking a cure for cancer in our time. And it makes the largest investment ever in preventive care, because that is one of the best ways to keep our people healthy and our costs under control.

This budget builds on these reforms. It includes an historic commitment to comprehensive health care reform – a down-payment on the principle that we must have quality, affordable health care for every American. It’s a commitment that’s paid for in part by efficiencies in our system that are long overdue. And it’s a step we must take if we hope to bring down our deficit in the years to come.

Now, there will be many different opinions and ideas about how to achieve reform, and that is why I’m bringing together businesses and workers, doctors and health care providers, Democrats and Republicans to begin work on this issue next week.

I suffer no illusions that this will be an easy process. It will be hard. But I also know that nearly a century after Teddy Roosevelt first called for reform, the cost of our health care has weighed down our economy and the conscience of our nation long enough. So let there be no doubt: health care reform cannot wait, it must not wait, and it will not wait another year.

The third challenge we must address is the urgent need to expand the promise of education in America.

In a global economy where the most valuable skill you can sell is your knowledge, a good education is no longer just a pathway to opportunity – it is a pre-requisite.

Right now, three-quarters of the fastest-growing occupations require more than a high school diploma. And yet, just over half of our citizens have that level of education. We have one of the highest high school dropout rates of any industrialized nation. And half of the students who begin college never finish.

This is a prescription for economic decline, because we know the countries that out-teach us today will out-compete us tomorrow. That is why it will be the goal of this administration to ensure that every child has access to a complete and competitive education – from the day they are born to the day they begin a career.

Already, we have made an historic investment in education through the economic recovery plan. We have dramatically expanded early childhood education and will continue to improve its quality, because we know that the most formative learning comes in those first years of life. We have made college affordable for nearly seven million more students. And we have provided the resources necessary to prevent painful cuts and teacher layoffs that would set back our children’s progress.

But we know that our schools don’t just need more resources. They need more reform. That is why this budget creates new incentives for teacher performance; pathways for advancement, and rewards for success. We’ll invest in innovative programs that are already helping schools meet high standards and close achievement gaps. And we will expand our commitment to charter schools.

It is our responsibility as lawmakers and educators to make this system work. But it is the responsibility of every citizen to participate in it. And so tonight, I ask every American to commit to at least one year or more of higher education or career training. This can be community college or a four-year school; vocational training or an apprenticeship. But whatever the training may be, every American will need to get more than a high school diploma. And dropping out of high school is no longer an option. It’s not just quitting on yourself, it’s quitting on your country – and this country needs and values the talents of every American. That is why we will provide the support necessary for you to complete college and meet a new goal: by 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.

I know that the price of tuition is higher than ever, which is why if you are willing to volunteer in your neighborhood or give back to your community or serve your country, we will make sure that you can afford a higher education. And to encourage a renewed spirit of national service for this and future generations, I ask this Congress to send me the bipartisan legislation that bears the name of Senator Orrin Hatch as well as an American who has never stopped asking what he can do for his country – Senator Edward Kennedy.

These education policies will open the doors of opportunity for our children. But it is up to us to ensure they walk through them. In the end, there is no program or policy that can substitute for a mother or father who will attend those parent/teacher conferences, or help with homework after dinner, or turn off the TV, put away the video games, and read to their child. I speak to you not just as a President, but as a father when I say that responsibility for our children’s education must begin at home.

There is, of course, another responsibility we have to our children. And that is the responsibility to ensure that we do not pass on to them a debt they cannot pay. With the deficit we inherited, the cost of the crisis we face, and the long-term challenges we must meet, it has never been more important to ensure that as our economy recovers, we do what it takes to bring this deficit down.

I’m proud that we passed the recovery plan free of earmarks, and I want to pass a budget next year that ensures that each dollar we spend reflects only our most important national priorities.

Yesterday, I held a fiscal summit where I pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office. My administration has also begun to go line by line through the federal budget in order to eliminate wasteful and ineffective programs. As you can imagine, this is a process that will take some time. But we’re starting with the biggest lines. We have already identified two trillion dollars in savings over the next decade.

In this budget, we will end education programs that don’t work and end direct payments to large agribusinesses that don’t need them. We’ll eliminate the no-bid contracts that have wasted billions in Iraq, and reform our defense budget so that we’re not paying for Cold War-era weapons systems we don’t use. We will root out the waste, fraud, and abuse in our Medicare program that doesn’t make our seniors any healthier, and we will restore a sense of fairness and balance to our tax code by finally ending the tax breaks for corporations that ship our jobs overseas.

In order to save our children from a future of debt, we will also end the tax breaks for the wealthiest 2% of Americans. But let me perfectly clear, because I know you’ll hear the same old claims that rolling back these tax breaks means a massive tax increase on the American people: if your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: not one single dime. In fact, the recovery plan provides a tax cut – that’s right, a tax cut – for 95% of working families. And these checks are on the way.

To preserve our long-term fiscal health, we must also address the growing costs in Medicare and Social Security. Comprehensive health care reform is the best way to strengthen Medicare for years to come. And we must also begin a conversation on how to do the same for Social Security, while creating tax-free universal savings accounts for all Americans.

Finally, because we’re also suffering from a deficit of trust, I am committed to restoring a sense of honesty and accountability to our budget. That is why this budget looks ahead ten years and accounts for spending that was left out under the old rules – and for the first time, that includes the full cost of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. For seven years, we have been a nation at war. No longer will we hide its price.

We are now carefully reviewing our policies in both wars, and I will soon announce a way forward in Iraq that leaves Iraq to its people and responsibly ends this war

And with our friends and allies, we will forge a new and comprehensive strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan to defeat al Qaeda and combat extremism. Because I will not allow terrorists to plot against the American people from safe havens half a world away.

As we meet here tonight, our men and women in uniform stand watch abroad and more are readying to deploy. To each and every one of them, and to the families who bear the quiet burden of their absence, Americans are united in sending one message: we honor your service, we are inspired by your sacrifice, and you have our unyielding support. To relieve the strain on our forces, my budget increases the number of our soldiers and Marines. And to keep our sacred trust with those who serve, we will raise their pay, and give our veterans the expanded health care and benefits that they have earned.

To overcome extremism, we must also be vigilant in upholding the values our troops defend – because there is no force in the world more powerful than the example of America. That is why I have ordered the closing of the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, and will seek swift and certain justice for captured terrorists – because living our values doesn’t make us weaker, it makes us safer and it makes us stronger. And that is why I can stand here tonight and say without exception or equivocation that the United States of America does not torture.

In words and deeds, we are showing the world that a new era of engagement has begun. For we know that America cannot meet the threats of this century alone, but the world cannot meet them without America. We cannot shun the negotiating table, nor ignore the foes or forces that could do us harm. We are instead called to move forward with the sense of confidence and candor that serious times demand.

To seek progress toward a secure and lasting peace between Israel and her neighbors, we have appointed an envoy to sustain our effort. To meet the challenges of the 21st century – from terrorism to nuclear proliferation; from pandemic disease to cyber threats to crushing poverty – we will strengthen old alliances, forge new ones, and use all elements of our national power.

And to respond to an economic crisis that is global in scope, we are working with the nations of the G-20 to restore confidence in our financial system, avoid the possibility of escalating protectionism, and spur demand for American goods in markets across the globe. For the world depends on us to have a strong economy, just as our economy depends on the strength of the world’s.

As we stand at this crossroads of history, the eyes of all people in all nations are once again upon us – watching to see what we do with this moment; waiting for us to lead.

Those of us gathered here tonight have been called to govern in extraordinary times. It is a tremendous burden, but also a great privilege – one that has been entrusted to few generations of Americans. For in our hands lies the ability to shape our world for good or for ill.

I know that it is easy to lose sight of this truth – to become cynical and doubtful; consumed with the petty and the trivial.

But in my life, I have also learned that hope is found in unlikely places; that inspiration often comes not from those with the most power or celebrity, but from the dreams and aspirations of Americans who are anything but ordinary.

I think about Leonard Abess, the bank president from Miami who reportedly cashed out of his company, took a $60 million bonus, and gave it out to all 399 people who worked for him, plus another 72 who used to work for him. He didn’t tell anyone, but when the local newspaper found out, he simply said, ”I knew some of these people since I was 7 years old. I didn’t feel right getting the money myself.”

I think about Greensburg, Kansas, a town that was completely destroyed by a tornado, but is being rebuilt by its residents as a global example of how clean energy can power an entire community – how it can bring jobs and businesses to a place where piles of bricks and rubble once lay. “The tragedy was terrible,” said one of the men who helped them rebuild. “But the folks here know that it also provided an incredible opportunity.”

And I think about Ty’Sheoma Bethea, the young girl from that school I visited in Dillon, South Carolina – a place where the ceilings leak, the paint peels off the walls, and they have to stop teaching six times a day because the train barrels by their classroom. She has been told that her school is hopeless, but the other day after class she went to the public library and typed up a letter to the people sitting in this room. She even asked her principal for the money to buy a stamp. The letter asks us for help, and says, “We are just students trying to become lawyers, doctors, congressmen like yourself and one day president, so we can make a change to not just the state of South Carolina but also the world. We are not quitters.”

We are not quitters.

These words and these stories tell us something about the spirit of the people who sent us here. They tell us that even in the most trying times, amid the most difficult circumstances, there is a generosity, a resilience, a decency, and a determination that perseveres; a willingness to take responsibility for our future and for posterity.

Their resolve must be our inspiration. Their concerns must be our cause. And we must show them and all our people that we are equal to the task before us.

I know that we haven’t agreed on every issue thus far, and there are surely times in the future when we will part ways. But I also know that every American who is sitting here tonight loves this country and wants it to succeed. That must be the starting point for every debate we have in the coming months, and where we return after those debates are done. That is the foundation on which the American people expect us to build common ground.

And if we do – if we come together and lift this nation from the depths of this crisis; if we put our people back to work and restart the engine of our prosperity; if we confront without fear the challenges of our time and summon that enduring spirit of an America that does not quit, then someday years from now our children can tell their children that this was the time when we performed, in the words that are carved into this very chamber, “something worthy to be remembered.” Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America.

And here’s the response to President Obama, delivered by Let Them Eat Cake Caucus Chairman Bobby Jindal:

Good evening. I’m Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana.

Tonight, we witnessed a great moment in the history of our Republic.
In the very chamber where Congress once voted to abolish slavery, our
first African-American President stepped forward to address the state
of our union. With his speech tonight, the President completed a
redemptive journey that took our nation from Independence Hall … to
Gettysburg … to the lunch counter … and now, finally, the Oval Office.

Regardless of party, all Americans are moved by the President’s
personal story – the son of an American mother and a Kenyan father,
who grew up to become leader of the free world. Like the President’s
father, my parents came to this country from a distant land. When
they arrived in Baton Rouge, my mother was already 4 ½ months
pregnant. I was what folks in the insurance industry now call a
‘pre-existing condition.’ To find work, my dad picked up the yellow
pages and started calling local businesses. Even after landing a job,
he could still not afford to pay for my delivery – so he worked out an
installment plan with the doctor. Fortunately for me, he never missed
a payment.

As I grew up, my mom and dad taught me the values that attracted them
to this country – and they instilled in me an immigrant’s wonder at
the greatness of America. As a child, I remember going to the
grocery store with my dad. Growing up in India, he had seen extreme
poverty. And as we walked through the aisles, looking at the endless
variety on the shelves, he would tell me: ‘Bobby, Americans can do
anything.’ I still believe that to this day. Americans can do
anything. When we pull together, there is no challenge we cannot
overcome.

As the President made clear this evening, we are now in a time of
challenge. Many of you listening tonight have lost jobs. Others
have seen your college and retirement savings dwindle. Many of you
are worried about losing your health care and your homes. And you are
looking to your elected leaders in Washington for solutions.

Republicans are ready to work with the new President to provide those
solutions. Here in my state of Louisiana, we don’t care what party
you belong to if you have good ideas to make life better for our
people. We need more of that attitude from both Democrats and
Republicans in our nation’s capital. All of us want our economy to
recover and our nation to prosper. So where we agree, Republicans
must be the President’s strongest partners. And where we disagree,
Republicans have a responsibility to be candid and offer better ideas
for a path forward.

Today in Washington, some are promising that government will rescue us
from the economic storms raging all around us.

Those of us who lived through Hurricane Katrina, we have our doubts.

Let me tell you a story.

During Katrina, I visited Sheriff Harry Lee, a Democrat and a good
friend of mine. When I walked into his makeshift office I’d never
seen him so angry. He was yelling into the phone: ‘Well, I’m the
Sheriff and if you don’t like it you can come and arrest me!’ I asked
him: ‘Sheriff, what’s got you so mad?’ He told me that he had put out
a call for volunteers to come with their boats to rescue people who
were trapped on their rooftops by the floodwaters. The boats were
all lined up ready to go – when some bureaucrat showed up and told
them they couldn’t go out on the water unless they had proof of
insurance and registration. I told him, ‘Sheriff, that’s ridiculous.’
And before I knew it, he was yelling into the phone: ‘Congressman
Jindal is here, and he says you can come and arrest him too!’ Harry
just told the boaters to ignore the bureaucrats and start rescuing
people.

There is a lesson in this experience: The strength of America is not
found in our government. It is found in the compassionate hearts and
enterprising spirit of our citizens. We are grateful for the support
we have received from across the nation for the ongoing recovery
efforts. This spirit got Louisiana through the hurricanes – and this
spirit will get our nation through the storms we face today.

To solve our current problems, Washington must lead. But the way to
lead is not to raise taxes and put more money and power in hands of
Washington politicians. The way to lead is by empowering you – the
American people. Because we believe that Americans can do anything.

That is why Republicans put forward plans to create jobs by lowering
income tax rates for working families … cutting taxes for small
businesses … strengthening incentives for businesses to invest in new
equipment and hire new workers … and stabilizing home values by
creating a new tax credit for home-buyers. These plans would cost
less and create more jobs.

But Democratic leaders in Congress rejected this approach. Instead of
trusting us to make wise decisions with our own money, they passed the
largest government spending bill in history – with a price tag of more
than $1 trillion with interest. While some of the projects in the
bill make sense, their legislation is larded with wasteful spending.
It includes $300 million to buy new cars for the government, $8
billion for high-speed rail projects, such as a ‘magnetic levitation’
line from Las Vegas to Disneyland, and $140 million for something
called ‘volcano monitoring.’ Instead of monitoring volcanoes, what
Congress should be monitoring is the eruption of spending in
Washington, DC.

Democratic leaders say their legislation will grow the economy. What
it will do is grow the government, increase our taxes down the line,
and saddle future generations with debt. Who among us would ask our
children for a loan, so we could spend money we do not have, on things
we do not need? That is precisely what the Democrats in Congress just
did. It’s irresponsible. And it’s no way to strengthen our economy,
create jobs, or build a prosperous future for our children.

In Louisiana, we took a different approach. Since I became governor,
we cut more than 250 earmarks from our state budget. And to create
jobs for our citizens, we cut taxes six times – including the largest
income tax cut in the history of our state. We passed those tax cuts
with bipartisan majorities. Republicans and Democrats put aside
their differences, and worked together to make sure our people could
keep more of what they earn. If it can be done in Baton Rouge, surely
it can be done in Washington, DC.

To strengthen our economy, we need urgent action to keep energy prices
down. All of us remember what it felt like to pay $4 at the pump -
and unless we act now, those prices will return. To stop that from
happening, we need to increase conservation … increase energy
efficiency … increase the use of alternative and renewable fuels …
increase our use of nuclear power – and increase drilling for oil and
gas here at home. We believe that Americans can do anything – and if
we unleash the innovative spirit of our citizens, we can achieve
energy independence.

To strengthen our economy, we also need to address the crisis in
health care. Republicans believe in a simple principle: No American
should have to worry about losing their health coverage – period. We
stand for universal access to affordable health care coverage. We
oppose universal government-run health care. Health care decisions
should be made by doctors and patients – not by government
bureaucrats. We believe Americans can do anything – and if we put
aside partisan politics and work together, we can make our system of
private medicine affordable and accessible for every one of our
citizens.

To strengthen our economy, we also need to make sure every child in
America gets the best possible education. After Katrina, we
reinvented the New Orleans school system – opening dozens of new
charter schools, and creating a new scholarship program that is giving
parents the chance to send their children to private or parochial
schools of their choice. We believe that, with the proper education,
the children of America can do anything. And it should not take a
devastating storm to bring this kind of innovation to education in our
country.

To strengthen our economy, we must promote confidence in America by
ensuring ours is the most ethical and transparent system in the world.
In my home state, there used to be saying: At any given time, half
of Louisiana is under water – and the other half is under indictment.
No one says that anymore. Last year, we passed some of the
strongest ethics laws in the nation – and today, Louisiana has turned
her back on the corruption of the past. We need to bring
transparency to Washington, DC – so we can rid our Capitol of
corruption … and ensure we never see the passage of another trillion
dollar spending bill that Congress has not even read and the American
people haven’t even seen.

As we take these steps, we must remember for all our troubles at home,
dangerous enemies still seek our destruction. Now is no time to
dismantle the defenses that have protected this country for hundreds
of years, or make deep cuts in funding for our troops. America’s
fighting men and women can do anything. And if we give them the
resources they need, they will stay on the offensive … defeat our
enemies … and protect us from harm.

In all these areas, Republicans want to work with President Obama. We
appreciate his message of hope – but sometimes it seems we look for
hope in different places. Democratic leaders in Washington place
their hope in the federal government. We place our hope in you – the
American people. In the end, it comes down to an honest and
fundamental disagreement about the proper role of government. We
oppose the National Democrats’ view that says — the way to strengthen
our country is to increase dependence on government. We believe the
way to strengthen our country is to restrain spending in Washington,
and empower individuals and small businesses to grow our economy and
create jobs.

In recent years, these distinctions in philosophy became less clear -
because our party got away from its principles. You elected
Republicans to champion limited government, fiscal discipline, and
personal responsibility. Instead, Republicans went along with
earmarks and big government spending in Washington. Republicans lost
your trust – and rightly so.

Tonight, on behalf of our leaders in Congress and my fellow Republican
governors, I say: Our party is determined to regain your trust. We
will do so by standing up for the principles that we share … the
principles you elected us to fight for … the principles that built
this into the greatest, most prosperous country on earth.

A few weeks ago, the President warned that our nation is facing a
crisis that he said ‘we may not be able to reverse.’ Our troubles are
real, to be sure. But don’t let anyone tell you that we cannot
recover – or that America’s best days are behind her. This is the
nation that cast off the scourge of slavery … overcame the Great
Depression … prevailed in two World Wars … won the struggle for civil
rights … defeated the Soviet menace … and responded with determined
courage to the attacks of September 11, 2001. The American spirit
has triumphed over almost every form of adversity known to man – and
the American spirit will triumph again.

We can have confidence in our future – because, amid today’s
challenges, we also count many blessings: We have the most innovative
citizens …the most abundant resources … the most resilient economy …
the most powerful military … and the freest political system in the
history of the world. My fellow citizens, never forget: We are
Americans. And like my dad said years ago, Americans can do anything.

Thank you for listening. God bless you. And God bless America.”

Comments Off


Schumer: Take It Or Leave It (UPDATED)

Today, Senator Schumer sent a letter to the White House arguing that the economic stimulus package doesn’t allow Governors to turn down certain parts of their state’s stimulus funds–they have to accept all or nothing:

As you know, Section 1607(a) of the economic recovery legislation provides that the Governor of each state must certify a request for stimulus funds before any money can flow. No language in this provision, however, permits the governor to selectively adopt some components of the bill while rejecting others. To allow such picking and choosing would, in effect, empower the governors with a line-item veto authority that President Obama himself did not possess at the time he signed the legislation. It would also undermine the overall success of the bill, as the components most singled out for criticism by these governors are among the most productive measures in terms of stimulating the economy.

In other words, the Bobby Jindals of America, the GOP Let-them-eat-cake caucus can’t take funding for that shiny new transportation project they’ve been eyeing while rejecting funds to help their constituents keep food on their tables.

It’s all or nothing–either Governors accept all the stimulus funds allocated to their states or they reject all of the money and leave their constituents to fend for themselves.

So what say you now, Governors Jindal, Sanford, and Barbour?

UPDATE: And the GOP’s oppose-it-at-all-costs strategy toward the economic stimulus package leads to problems like this:

In an interview with the Washington Times, the Republican governor of Utah on Monday said his party’s leaders in Congress’ lack of new ideas renders them so “inconsequential” that he doesn’t even bother to talk to them.

That’s not the Governor or California or Vermont or Rhode Island saying that; that’s the Governor of dead-red Utah calling the national Republican leadership “inconsequential”.

I wonder if the GOP realized that their opposition to the stimulus package would eventually become a wedge issue for their own party?

Comments Off


Rich Guy Populism Not Very Popular

So, it turns out that the American people trust politicians more than businessmen when it comes to handling the economy:

53 percent of those questioned said they have confidence in Republicans in Congress making the right calls regarding the economy. About 66 percent said they have confidence Democrats, who control Congress, will make the right economic decisions. And 75 percent said they think President Barack Obama will make the right moves when it comes dealing with the recession.

[...]

But Wall Street investors? Bankers and financial executives? Auto company executives? No more than 30 percent have confidence in them.

[Emphasis mine]

And then there’s this:

Washington Post-ABC News

On another economic issue, would you support or oppose the federal government using 75 billion dollars to provide refinancing assistance to homeowners to help them avoid foreclosure on their mortgages?

[2/22]  64% SUPPORT / 35% OPPOSE

So the American people trust politicians more than business leaders and they support the President’s plan to provide assistance to American families facing foreclosure and eviction?

But Politico told me that America was a nation of Rick Santellis! You mean most Americans aren’t wealthy stock traders who prefer that the federal government spend billions to prop up banks and Wall Street instead of helping working Americans avoid eviction?

I guess the American people actually want their government to fix this economic crisis instead of, say, dumping shrink-wrapped pallets of cash at the New York Stock Exchange.  So can we all stop pretending that Rick Santelli and his Brooks Brothers Mob speak for anyone but the wealthy and well-connected and go back to figuring out how we’re going to save America from further conservative economic ruination?

Comments Off


BREAKING: Gary Locke Picked For Commerce Secretary

HuffPo has it:

Politico reports that President Obama is likely to announce former Washington governor Gary Locke as his choice for Commerce Secretary this week, a senior administration official said.

Locke was the first Chinese-American governor in U.S. history. He served two terms in Washington state from 1997 to 2005. He chose to step down to spend more time with his kids. Ugly, racist threats against his family also played a factor in Locke’s decision to not seek a third term. In 2003, a member of an extreme right-wing group was arrested for plotting to assassinate Gov. Locke.

[...]

After receiving his law degree from Boston University in 1975, he worked for several years as a deputy prosecutor in King County, prosecuting felony crimes. In 1982, Locke was elected to the Washington State House of Representatives, where he served on the House Judiciary and Appropriations committees, with his final five years spent as chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

A Seattle-based blogger gives his perspective on Locke’s confirmation chances:

Locke isn’t exactly a lot of folks’ favorite governor, though apart from his conventional approach to trade issues it’s hard to argue that he’s a bad choice for Commerce.

Washington is one of our nation’s most export dependent states, consistently ranking fourth overall in total exports behind California, Texas and New York, and first in exports per capita.  And as our nation’s first Chinese-American governor Locke is uniquely positioned to bridge the cultural gap with one our most important trading partners.

I’d say this is a safe appointment for Obama, one that will generate little excitement and little controversy.  Locke is honest, workmanlike, and socially progressive (by national standards) if politically cautious, and while I’d prefer a Commerce Secretary who might at least challenge the current orthodoxy on trade, given his tenure in the governor’s mansion I wouldn’t expect much leadership from him on these issues one way or the other.

Unless he’s got some tax or nanny issue I’m unaware of, this should be an easy confirmation.

Comments Off