Democrashield.com


The Party Of Fail (UPDATED X2)

When Congress was debating the economic stimulus package a few months ago, the GOP turned into the party of Beavis and Butthead (as Paul Krugman put it), mocking parts of the bill they didn’t like without bothering to prove that those particular expenditures weren’t stimulus.

For instance, LA Gov. Bobby Jindal mocked funding for volcano monitoring, and the GOP had a good laugh about it–that is, until AK’s Mount Redoubt erupted and lives were saved thanks to those very volcano monitoring programs. Whoops.

In addition, Susan Collins, Arlen Specter and Karl Rove–among others–mocked funding for “pandemic flu preparations.” But, as it turns out, that $900 million would probably have come in pretty handy right now, considering that we’re on the brink of a pandemic flu outbreak. Oops.

And to top it all off, the GOP is filibustering Obama’s nominee to be Secretary of Health and Human Services, meaning that there’s nobody heading up that department even though we’re in the midst of a serious pandemic flu outbreak. Heckauva job, guys!

This is why the American people don’t trust Republicans anymore–even when they’re out of power, they’re still messing everything up. Hey guys–there’s a reason why Obama’s approval ratings are up there and your approval ratings are down here.

UPDATE: Of course, I log onto my favorite right-wing blogs this morning and they’re all playing the same tune– something along the lines of “Liberals are saying swine flu is all the evil GOP’s fault!”

No, we’re not saying the outbreak of the swine flu is your fault. We’re saying that we could have done more to prepare for a pandemic flu scenario–in fact, were going to do more to prepare for it–except you all kept whining about the cost.

And we’re criticizing you for filibustering the nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services because you dislike her position on abortion, since we really, really could use a Secretary of Health and Human Services right now.

So no, nobody’s saying the flu outbreak is your fault. But we are criticizing you for sitting there and playing politics while we’ve been trying to prepare for something like this.

Our country is dealing with some major problems right now. Either grow up and help us fix them or get out of the way and let us take care of things. Once again, Republican obstinace is causing major problems and it’s getting really, really tiring.

UPDATE II: And Chuck Schumer, my former Senator, deserves criticism for this:

All those little porky things that the House put in, the money for the [National] Mall or the sexually transmitted diseases or the flu pandemic, they’re all out.

Bad call, in retrospect.

Of course, there wouldn’t have been an impetus for lawmakers to strip out expenditures for things such as pandemic flu preparation if the right hadn’t spent weeks screaming at the top of their lungs, calling the stimulus package things like “spendulus,” “porkulus,” and “the generational theft act of 2009″ and pushing lawmakers to strip out as many expenditures as possible.

But since the right can’t take responsibility for anything, the right will just keep gibbering that “Chuckie Schumer opposed pandemic flu funding, too!!”

Because politics always happens completely within a vacuum, right?

Comments Off


Going Long On Going Green

President Obama is set to completely upend some Bush-era environmental regulations:

President Obama on Monday will direct federal regulators to move swiftly to grant California and 13 other states the right to set strict automobile emissions and fuel efficiency standards, two administration officials said Sunday evening.

The directive makes good on an Obama campaign pledge and marks a sharp reversal from Bush administration policy. Granting California and the other states the right to regulate tailpipe emissions is one of the most dramatic actions Mr. Obama can take to quickly put his stamp on environmental policy.



The Six

Though President Obama was only inaugurated yesterday, the Senate has already confirmed six of his cabinet appointees:

  • Energy Secretary Stephen Chu
  • Education Secretary Arne Duncan
  • Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano
  • Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki
  • Interior Secretary Ken Salazar
  • Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack

Hillary Clinton would be on that list except for the fact that newly-minted NRSC head John Cornyn is demanding a floor debate on her confirmation, despite the fact that Clinton sailed through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and is as close to a shoo-in as any cabinet appointee could be.

There’s nothing the GOP gains by mucking up Clinton’s confirmation–she’s going to be approved no matter what and no amount of trumped-up right-wing vitriol will change that or undermine her authority as Secretary of State.  Here the GOP is just obstructing for obstruction’s sake, which is pretty much going to be their playbook for the next few years.

This incident does teach us two important lessons, though.  First, Republicans have always hated the Clintons and only ever pretended to like Hillary in order to undermine Obama.  Two, the GOP doesn’t agree with Obama that “the time has come to set aside childish things;” in fact, Senate Republicans are basing their entire legislative strategy on childish things.

Comments Off


“Concessions”

In regards to President-elect Obama’s economic stimulus proposal, I wrote that:

I think Obama is using a smart bargaining strategy here–he proposes a modest plan, lets economists criticize it for being inadequate, and then uses that criticism to expand the plan and bump up the price tag. In the end, it will look like Obama is compromising and relying on experts to craft the plan, but the final product will look a lot like what Obama wanted to propose in the first place.

Well, here’s the headline from The Huffington Post:

Obama Team Offers Concessions On Stimulus In Talks With Senate Dems

And here’s more from Politico:

President-elect Barack Obama tried Sunday to shore up support in Congress for his ambitious economic policies, with his top advisers offering concessions on his economic-stimulus proposal and preparing to detail conditions for how the incoming administration will spend the second half of the $700 billion financial rescue package.

[...]

Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) both said that Obama’s team signaled that their new proposal would double the funds dedicated to energy tax credits, to at least $20 billion.

“They’re moving in our direction,” Boxer said, adding that the Obama team assured Democrats that the money given to state governments would reach cities and counties suffering from budget shortfalls.

[Emphasis added]

Like I said, I think this is some brilliant maneuvering on Obama’s part.  If he started with a $1.5 trillion package, the price tag alone would cause lawmakers to balk, forcing Obama to cut the bill down.

But since Obama’s initial proposal wasn’t big enough,  he can now add more progressive spending under the guise of “compromising” and “making concessions.” I mean, look at what he “conceded” to Senate Democrats–alternative energy tax credits.  I doubt they had to pull teeth to get Obama to agree to that, but now it looks like he added it in as a concession.

So in the end, the final package will look like it was built through negotiation and concessions, even though it will be full of progressive policies and spending that normally would have been non-starters had they all been packed together into one huge bill.

Comments Off


Mr. Fixit

Solving high unemployment with green-collar jobs:

Only 10 days until inauguration; it can’t come soon enough.

Comments Off


First 10 Senate Bills Of The 111th Congress

Here they are:

  • S.1 — American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. “To create jobs, restore economic growth, and strengthen America’s middle class through measures that modernize the nation’s infrastructure, enhance America’s energy independence, expand educational opportunities, preserve and improve affordable health care, provide tax relief, and protect those in greatest need, and for other purposes.” The stimulus bill; no surprises here.
  • S.2 — Middle Class Opportunity Act of 2009. Sound familiar? This is a retread of a bill sponsored by Senator Chuck Schumer in the last Congress that has a variety of tax reform goals; the additional descriptions in this bill include hints at union support (”ensuring workers can exercise their rights to freely choose to form a union without employer interference”) and perhaps another go at the Ledbetter law (”removing barriers to fair pay for all workers”).
  • S.3 — Homeowner Protection and Wall Street Accountability Act of 2009. This bill will include a moratorium on foreclosures, Senator Dick Durbin’s plan to allow for easier reworking of troubled mortgages by bankruptcy judges, new regulations for the credit card and financial industry, and investment in the Small Business Administration to provide loans for small businesses in need. It also makes TARP — the Wall Street bailout — a larger part of foreclosure reduction.
  • S.4 — Comprehensive Health Reform Act of 2009. “It is the sense of Congress that Congress should enact, and the President should sign, legislation to guarantee health coverage, improve health care quality and disease prevention, and reduce health care costs for all Americans and the health care system.” Paging Ezra!
  • S.5 — Cleaner, Greener, and Smarter Act of 2009. This is a bill that focuses mainly on green investment and updating infrastructure to be more efficient and less polluting. But since a lot of those priorities are expected to be rolled into the stimulus package, one wonders if this is a vehicle for cap-and-trade and the Kyoto Protocols, given this provision: “requiring reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States and achieving reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases abroad.”
  • S.6. — Restoring America’s Power Act of 2009. This is basically the Democrats’ ‘08 foreign policy consensus: Refocus on Afghanistan, transition in Iraq, strengthen alliances, WMD non-proliferation in Iran and North Korea… you get the idea. Most of this is in the executive branch’s bailiwick so this legislation may just be a supportive resolution indicating that if Obama needs new authorities or resources to accomplish these goals, he’ll get them. The bill also includes goals of providing proper training and equipment to the Armed Forces, and medical care when they return from duty.
  • S.7 — Education Opportunity Act of 2009. “To expand educational opportunities for all Americans by increasing access to high-quality early childhood education and after school programs, advancing reform in elementary and secondary education, strengthening mathematics and science instruction, and ensuring that higher education is more affordable.” An education omnibus bill that will no doubt be split up into separate pieces of legislation.
  • S.8 — Returning Government to the American People Act. “To return the Government to the people by reviewing controversial ‘midnight regulations’ issued in the waning days of the Bush Administration.” A sentiment we can all get behind, which promises to provide the new administration legislative authority, if it doesn’t have it already, to review (and presumably deny) the last administration’s late regulations.
  • S.9 — Stronger Economy, Stronger Borders Act of 2009. Seems to be a placeholder for comprehensive immigration reform, including stronger border and employment security to crackdown on illegal immigration while “reforming and rationalizing avenues for legal immigration.”
  • S.10 — Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009. Gosh, this one is interesting. It’s one part congressional hand-wringing over the fact that “the Federal budget is on an unsustainable path of rising deficits and debt,” and it calls for a study of this. It’s one part fiscal hawkery, supporting “strong pay-as-you-go rules, to help block the approval of measures that would increase the deficit.” And it’s one part … populist? “A review of the current system of taxation of the United States to ensure that burdens are borne fairly and equitably.” That could be the justification for the Bush tax cut rollback in 2010.
Comments Off


“Clean Coal”

Still dirty:

Just-released independent water sampling data from the Tennessee coal ash disaster has shown alarmingly high levels of arsenic and seven other heavy metals, including cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury and thallium.

“I’ve never seen levels this high,” said Dr. Shea Tuberty, Assistant Professor of Biology at the Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Lab at Appalachian State University. “These levels would knock out fish reproduction … the ecosystems around Kingston and Harriman are going to be in trouble … maybe for generations.

[...]

Arsenic levels were especially worrisome. “From the water samples you gave us, we had anywhere from 35 to 300 times that [EPA] level” of 10 parts per billion for drinking water, said Tuberty to Upper Watauga Riverkeeper Donna Lisenby, who floated a kayak around the “ashbergs” on Decmber 27, five days after the disaster.

After testing for presence of 17 elements that are regulated by the EPA for drinking water, the Appalachian State University team of Tuberty and Dr. Carol Baybak found that the three water samples and one sediment sample provided by volunteers from the Waterkeeper Alliance and Appalachian Voices showed that “eight of them popped out as significantly higher than they should have been for drinking water.”

The test data can be found here.

[Emphasis Added]

The coal industry is spending millions of dollars advertising “clean coal,” despite the fact that clean coal technology doesn’t yet exist and questions remain as to whether the waste from burning coal can be adequately contained as to make coal “clean.”

But for a small fraction of the money spent advertising “clean coal,” the coal industry could have avoided this catastrophic environmental damage.  How can we trust the coal industry to be able to deliver “clean coal” if they can’t build and maintain a simple fly ash retention pond?

We should be divesting in coal and investing in developing, building and implementing naturally clean sources of energy.  All the workers in the coal industry should be retrained and redirected into green-collar jobs, because the sooner we transition away from fossil fuels, the better off our environment–and our economy–will be.

Comments Off


Legacy

While hundreds of people are being killed in fighting between Israel and Palestine, with Israel declaring “all-out war” on Palestinian group Hamas, the 43rd President of the United States is on vacation.

And he is refusing to end his vacation to go back to Washington and deal with the crisis. Which isn’t surprising, considering 43’s status as the most vacation-happy president in all of American history, despite the myriad crises that have occurred during his tenure.

That, above all else, will be the legacy of George W. Bush: inaction.

In August, 2001, while on vacation, George W. Bush received an intelligence briefing entitled “Bin Laden Determined To Strike In US.”  That briefing warned about terrorist recruitment and activity in New York City and cautioned that Osama Bin Laden was planning to use hijacked airplanes in a terrorist attack. Bush remained on vacation.

In August, 2005, President Bush was on another vacation in Texas.  In Louisiana, Hurricane Katrina bore down on New Orleans, threatening that city’s unfinished network of protective levees.  It was known well in advance what kind of damage a storm of Katrina’s caliber would do, leaving much of the city underwater and disproportionately harming those too old, too sick or too poor to evacuate.  Even after Katrina made landfall, Bush remained on vacation.

Despite what he and his advisers may say, history will not remember George W. Bush kindly–it’s more likely he will be remembered as a modern-day Nero, fiddling away while the world around him burned.

The rotting core of the Bush administration was incompetence, which is timeless.  Historians far into the future will still remember what that word means, and that’s the word they will use to describe America’s government from 2001-2009.

That, unfortunately for all of us, will be the legacy of George W. Bush.  History will only ever remember him more kindly if it turns out to be easier than expected to fix the messes he created.  There is just too little good in the past eight years to build a remotely salvageable legacy out of.



The IPCC Was Wrong

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was wrong about global warming; according to the United States Geological Survey, it’s actually happening faster than expected:

Looking at factors such as rapid sea ice loss in the Arctic and prolonged drought in the Southwest, the new assessment suggests that earlier projections may have underestimated the climatic shifts that could take place by 2100.

However, the assessment also suggests that some other feared effects of global warming are not likely to occur by the end of the century, such as an abrupt release of methane from the seabed and permafrost or a shutdown of the Atlantic Ocean circulation system that brings warm water north and colder water south. But the report projects an amount of potential sea level rise during that period that may be greater than what other researchers have anticipated, as well as a shift to a more arid climate pattern in the Southwest by mid-century.

Thirty-two scientists from federal and non-federal institutions contributed to the report, which took nearly two years to complete. The Climate Change Science Program, which was established in 1990, coordinates the climate research of 13 different federal agencies.

[...]

In one of the report’s most worrisome findings, the agency estimates that in light of recent ice sheet melting, global sea level rise could be as much as four feet by 2100. The IPCC had projected a sea level rise of no more than 1.5 feet by that time, but satellite data over the past two years show the world’s major ice sheets are melting much more rapidly than previously thought. The Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets are now losing an average of 48 cubic miles of ice a year, equivalent to twice the amount of ice that exists in the Alps.

Konrad Steffen, who directs the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado at Boulder and was lead author on the report’s chapter on ice sheets, said the models the IPCC used did not factor in some of the dynamics that scientists now understand about ice sheet melting. Among other things, Steffen and his collaborators have identified a process of “lubrication,” in which warmer ocean water gets in underneath coastal ice sheets and accelerates melting.

[...]

While predictions remain uncertain, Steffen said cutting emissions linked to global warming represents one of the best strategies for averting catastrophic changes.

“We have to act very fast, by understanding better and by reducing our greenhouse gas emissions, because it’s a large-scale experiment that can get out of hand,” Steffen said. “So we don’t want that to happen.”

[Emphasis mine]

But, according to conservatives, global warming is a hoax because it still gets cold in winter.

Comments Off


Clean Coal (UPDATED)

Still doesn’t exist:

Workers face “several weeks’ worth of work” to clean up 3.1 million cubic feet of fly ash dumped across hundreds of acres after a retention pond collapsed early Monday morning at the Tennessee Valley Authority’s Kingston steam plant.

No injuries have been reported, but one house was swept off of its foundation and onto the road, and huge piles of a mixture of water, mud and ash covered Swan Pond Road in Roane County.

“We’ve got a mess,” said Tom Hamby of the Roane County Highway Department. “The problem is, you don’t know what’s under this stuff.”

[...]

The 40-acre pond was used by TVA as a containment area for ash generated by the coal-burning steam plant, [TVA spokesman Gil] Francis said. An earthen wall gave way just before 1 a.m., flooding the road and railroad tracks leading to the plant.

Remember, you can’t make coal burn clean.  The idea behind clean coal is that the environmentally-harmful wastes created by burning coal–including mercury, ash, CO2 and other greenhouse gasses–can be contained in a way that will eliminate their impact on the environment.

If coal plants can’t contain polluted water sitting in a retention pond, how are they supposed to contain the billions of tons of carbon dioxide produced per year? And, even more importantly, why should we invest our tax d0llars in trying to clean up a dirty technology when we could just invest that money in creating natural, clean, renewable sources of energy?

UPDATE: Here’s aerial footage of the flood:



The Young And The Liberal

young1

The Republican Party is in trouble.

Going into 2009, they find themselves in an electoral purgatory they won’t leave anytime soon. As AEI’s David Frum says,

College-educated Americans have come to believe that their money is safe with Democrats–but that their values are under threat from Republicans. And there are more and more of these college-educated Americans all the time.

So the question for the GOP is: will it pursue them? To do so will involve painful change, on issues ranging from the environment to abortion. And it will potentially involve even more painful changes of style and tone: toward a future that is less overtly religious, less negligent with policy, and less polarizing on social issues. That is a future that leaves little room for Palin–but it is the only hope for a Republican recovery.

Frum strikes at the heart of the GOP’s problem–they perform terribly among younger voters who, as time goes on, will start to make up more and more of the electorate.

The Generation Gap

In fact, if you look at where Americans stand on the issues, you find that there is a significant generation gap between younger voters and older voters.

Take, for instance, the environment:

Most young Americans age 13 to 24 are at least somewhat concerned about global warming – and the more they know about it, the more concerned about it they are.

Large majorities say the time to do something about global warming is right NOW. And many pick the environment as the biggest problem that their generation will need to solve.

And look at gay marriage: in May, 2008, Pew Research found that 52% of 18-29 year olds support gay marriage. Compare that to just 40% of 30-49 year-olds, 34% of 50-64 year-olds and 24% of voters 65 and older who support it.

And the same holds true on other issues like the war and immigration.  There is a generational gap and, unfortunately for them, Republicans are on the wrong side of the divide.

Modern History

And it’s not just the parties’ stances on the issues; part of the problem is recent history.

Most of my generation only remembers two Presidents: Bill Clinton, successful but personally flawed, and George W. Bush, a failure.

We only know the political parties as they exist now, not as they once existed; from our limited perspective, Democrats are better governors than Republicans. We lack the perspective that older Americans have, where they can look back towards Reagan or Carter or Kennedy or Eisenhower.

That isn’t to say young voters are stupid or short-sighted, but different generations have different experiences–you couldn’t blame young people for not remembering Reagan any more than you could blame a 50 year old is for remembering the great depression. But that doesn’t change the fact that the GOP’s modern history has been spotty; they haven’t given my generation any reason to believe in them.

To look at 2008, Barack Obama ran a great campaign and John McCain ran a  poor campaign. 2008 was, essentially, a microcosm of where the two political parties stand–one is innovative and effective and the other is incompetent and out-of-touch.

Obama’s ideas were new—how many presidential candidates have run unabashedly on alternative energy and universal health care? Not only were those policies new, but that were relevant solutions to the issues our country faces.

McCain, on the other hand, ran a backwards-looking campaign. How much of his campaign was based on what he did in Vietnam? And how many of his policies were based on the same Reaganite/Gingrichean ideas we’ve heard a thousand times before?

There used to be an old canard that the GOP was the party of ideas. Well, in short time the Democrats have turned that around and emerged as the party of idea, leaving the GOP in the dust. 

Aiding And Abetting The Enemy

So, what advice do I have for the GOP to win over young voters again?

First, it’s about competence. Young people only know the GOP as the incompetent Bushean party that can’t be trusted with power; proving to us that Republicans can do a good job when trusted with power will go a long way.

To do that, it’s time to abandon the Reaganite idea that government is always bad.  That’s a nearly 30-year-old talking point that came about when our country was in a very different place. The truth is, the government can do a lot of good for people and, in some respects–such as disaster relief–we need a strong, well-funded and well-prepared government. If the GOP is bent on indiscriminately dismantling government at every opportunity then we have no reason to trust them with it.

Second, I agree with Frum–the GOP has to start rethinking it’s positions on a lot of the issues, particularly the highly-divisive social issues.

There was a time when the GOP was very skilled at winning support by using divisive wedge issues. But now a massive backlash has developed–people are tired of being divided and fighting the same battles year after year. That dissatisfaction was an intrinsic part of Obama’s victory.

When it comes to the social issues Republicans used to win votes, young voters just aren’t interested; my generation is more open-minded and tolerant than any ever before it, even among young conservatives. By pursuing rigid conservative ideological purity, the GOP may end up losing an entire generation of voters forever.

Comments Off


Vilsack For Secretary Of Agriculture
v-for-vilsack1

V for Vilsack!

President-elect Barack Obama will announce today that he has selected former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack to be his Secretary of Agriculture:

Obama supports a $250,000 a year “hard” cap on farm payments and stricter rules on who qualifies as a farmer, changes that could save $100 million a year. Last month, he cited a congressional report on improper farm payments as an example of where to save federal money.

If confirmed by the Senate, Vilsack, 58, would be the first Iowan to lead the Agriculture Department since Henry Wallace during the Depression era.

[...]

Critics said Vilsack is too much of a supporter of agricultural biotechnology and not enough of a friend to organic or sustainable farmers.

The National Farmers Union said Vilsack was “a great choice” who understands the threat to farmers from U.S. recession and the potential income from renewable energy.

On his website for the presidential transition, Obama says he would “ensure that our rural areas continue their leadership in the renewable fuels movement.” Corn-based ethanol is the major biofuel now produced. The next generation of fuels is expected to use feedstocks like wood chips and grasses, reducing “food vs. fuel” friction.

Obama also supports strict regulation of pollution from large-scale feedlots, a ban on meatpackers raising livestock in competition with farmers and country-of-origin labels on U.S. food “so that American producers can distinguish their products from imported ones.”

Vilsack is a good choice. His rocky record on organic and sustainable farming is a cause for concern, since we need to move away from big , environmentally-unfriendly agribusiness and back toward a system of smaller farms with sustainable, higher-quality products, but I have confidence that he’ll faithfully carry out Obama’s agenda.

Since Vilsack (briefly) competed in the 2008 primary, this brings the number of former Obama rivals in the administration up to four (Biden, Clinton, Richardson and Vilsack).

The only drawback to the appointment is that Vilsack won’t be able to compete against Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley in 2010; preliminary polling showed Vilsack within 4 points of the 28-year Senate veteran.



Salazar To Interior?

11

It looks like it:

A transition official for President-elect Barack Obama says Colorado Sen. Ken Salazar will be named Interior Secretary later this week.

The appointment will round out Obama’s environment and energy team. He unveiled most of the team on Monday. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid pre-empting Obama’s upcoming announcement.

Salazar is a first-term Colorado Senator who has established a name for himself on public lands and energy resources issues. He headed the Colorado Natural Resources Department from 1990 through 1994. The Interior Department has broad oversight over the nation’s energy resources and environment. It oversees oil and gas drilling on public lands and manages the nation’s parks and wildlife refuges.

If this is true I’ll be somewhat disappointed–I was hoping AZ Rep. Raul Grijalva would get Interior.

Still, I’m sure Salazar will do a great job, though –if he accepts–we’ll have another open Senate seat on our hands.    Fortunately, Colorado has a Democratic governor, so if Salazar accepts it won’t impact the size of the Democratic caucus.

As for replacements, the Lieutenant Governor of Colorado is Democrat Barbara O’Brien, but she was just elected in 2006 making it unlikely she would be tapped to move up so soon. Colorado’s Attorney General is a Republican.

CO has three incumbent members of Congress–Diana DeGette, John Salazar (brother of Ken) and Ed Perlmutter.  DeGette has been office since ‘97; Salazar since ‘05 and Perlmutter since ‘07.

CO has been trending blue, so I don’t expect to have too hard of a time holding onto it in 2010.  Still, who Governor Ritter taps to replace Salazar may have a big impact on how things play out in the future.

Comments Off


Obama Announces Dream Green Team

doe1 epa2 hud3

Today, President-elect Barack Obama announced his choices to fill key positions relating to energy and the environment:

  • Dr. Steven Chu, Secretary of Energy
  • Lisa Jackson, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator
  • Nancy Sutley, Chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality
  • Carol Browner, Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change
  • Heather Zichal, Deputy Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change

Over the weekend, Obama tapped NYC Commissioner of Housing Preservation and Development Shaun Donovan to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

And Adolfo Carrion, who was rumored earlier to have been tapped by Obama for some position or another, was picked as the next head of the White House Office of Urban Policy.



The Myth Of “Clean Coal”

There is no such thing as clean coal.

“Clean coal” is an umbrella term for a several technologies designed to reduce the negative environmental impact of burning coal, the most prominent of which is carbon sequestration.

The idea behind carbon sequestration is that the CO2 released by burning coal for energy can be captured and stored in a way that keeps it out of the atmosphere. But that’s an inherently risky approach, like the storage of any other environmentally-hazardous material; there’s no guarantee those captured gasses will remain sequestered forever, and the potential that they could leak back out into the environment is significant.

Plus, it’s not just the CO2 that makes coal dangerous:

Coal-fired power plants are not only a major source of carbon-dioxide emissions that contribute to global warming, they are also one of the leading sources of fine particulate matter linked to asthma and other respiratory problems.

[...]

Even if greenhouse gases and all other pollutants emitted by coal-fired power plants could be controlled, coal mining itself would still create adverse environmental impacts. Making coal “clean” would require a lot more than capturing the carbon emissions.

Not to mention that–according to the EPA–coal-fired power plants are the largest remaining source of human-generated mercury emissions in the United States.

So sequestering carbon dioxide emissions wouldn’t even begin to address the other environmental damage caused by mining and burning coal.

The fact is, coal is dirty. And despite all the money spent to advertise clean coal, there isn’t a single “clean coal” plant operating anywhere in America. There isn’t a single household in the United States powered by “clean coal.” And out of the roughly 600 electricity-generating coal plants in this country, none of them employs “clean coal technology.” Not one.

We need to move away from all fossil fuels and move toward naturally-clean, renewable sources of energy. There is no reason for us to invest millions of dollars in cleaning up a pre-existing technology when we can invest those same millions in developing new, already-clean sources of energy.

Plus, in researching, developing, building and implementing those new technologies, we can create millions of new green-collar jobs.

It can be done, so let’s get it done. That’s the American way.

Comments Off


Why They Lost

This is why I read John Cole:

The Republicans have lost the last two elections not because of media bias, but because they are being blamed for the current mess we are in, and they are being blamed for good reason. Until 2006 they controlled Congress and the White House, right now they control the White House. Listening to Republicans trying to blame their loss on media bias is like listening to OJ Simpson trying to blame his conviction on racism.

The Republicans did not lose because of media bias. Dan Rather wasn’t in New Orleans knocking water bottles out of people’s hands at the convention center. Brian Williams didn’t crash the stock market. Keith Olbermann didn’t invade Iraq. Chris Matthews doesn’t run OPEC.

Republicans lost because they were in charge of the country for the better part of the last decade, and their governance has been an unmitigated disaster. This is not rocket science. You can argue that Democrats should share some of the blame for some of the policies, and you would not get any disagreement from me, but that does not change the fact that the Republicans were in charge, and blew it.

[Emphasis mine]

Considering the amount of spinning the GOP has done on their election loss, I’m surprised they haven’t accidentally drilled through the floor yet.

Let’s be serious here, the longer it takes for the GOP to actually sit down and take a serious look at what’s wrong with their ideology and how they govern, the longer they will stay out of power.

Scapegoats like “the liberal media” and cracker-thin ideas like “we need to get back to Reagan!” aren’t going to cut it.  The GOP needs some serious soul-searching and they need to implement some major changes.

Remember, the Democratic Party that won in 2006 and 2008 was vastly different than the Democratic Party that won in 1992 and 1996; the only way we won is because we were vastly different.

The GOP will spend some much-deserved time in the wilderness, though they will be the ones to determine just how much time it will be.



Thanksgiving (UPDATED)

In honor of the holiday I’m reposting one of my most popular posts, entitled Thank A Democrat:

If you’re not a wealthy landowner and you vote, thank a Democrat: Andrew Jackson got rid of laws that discriminated against working-class Americans by restricting voting to wealthy landholders.

If you’re a woman and you vote, thank a Democrat: Woodrow Wilson supported the 19th Amendment, which was passed and ratified during his Presidency.

If you have ever voted while between the ages of 18 and 21, thank a Democrat: Lyndon Johnson and the Democratic Congress passed the 26th Amendment, lowering the voting age to 18.

If you never experienced racial segregation, thank a Democrat: Lyndon Johnson and the Democratic Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, which outlawed racial segregation in public schools and public places.

If you never had to take a literacy test or pay a poll tax to vote, thank a Democrat: Lyndon Johnson and the Democratic Congress passed the Voting Rights Act, which outlawed literacy tests as a requirement for voting, as well as the 24th Amendment, which outlawed poll taxes.

If you earn a fair wage, get paid overtime and/or was never subjected to child labor, thank a Democrat: Franklin Roosevelt and the Democratic Congress passed the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act, which set the first national minimum wage, created requirements for overtime compensation and outlawed child labor.

If you have ever received benefits through Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid, thank a Democrat: Franklin Roosevelt and the Democratic Congress passed the Social Security Act, while Lyndon Johnson and the Democratic Congress passed Medicare and Medicaid.

If you or your child has ever benefited from Head Start or SCHIP, thank a Democrat: Head Start was passed by Lyndon Johnson and the Democratic Congress, while SCHIP was championed by Ted Kennedy and signed into law by Bill Clinton.

If you have ever worked in a clean, safe workplace, thank a Democrat: in 1970, the Democratic Congress passed the Occupational Safety and Health Act, which created national standards for workplace cleanliness and safety.

If you or anyone in your family has taken time off work due to a serious illness, accident, or birth of a child, thank a Democrat: Chris Dodd championed the Family and Medical Leave Act, which required employers to provide paid time off for their employees due to sickness, injury or to care for a newborn child. The Democratic Congress passed FMLA, which was signed into law by Bill Clinton.

If you, your parents or your grandparents were helped by the G.I. Bill, thank a Democrat: the G.I. Bill granted veterans loans to pursue higher education and purchase houses, as well as providing unemployment benefits. It was one of Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal initiatives, and it was passed by a Democratic Congress.

If you’re a woman who is paid as much as your male coworkers, thank a Democrat: Lyndon Johnson and the Democratic Congress passed the Equal Pay Act of 1963, guaranteeing equal pay for workers regardless of their gender.

If you’ve never been discriminated against due to your age or physical disability, thank a Democrat: The Age Discrimination in Employment Act was passed by Lyndon Johnson and the Democratic Congress, while the Americans with Disabilities Act was also passed by a Democratic Congress.

If you enjoy clean air and water, thank a Democrat: the Clean Air Act was passed by the Democratic Congress in 1963 and signed into law by Lyndon Johnson; the Clean Water Act was passed by the Democratic Congress in 1977 and signed into law by Jimmy Carter.

If you enjoy freedom and security, thank a Democrat: James Monroe established the Monroe Doctrine, which kept Europe interfering with the free Western Hemisphere. Andrew Jackson fought against the British in the War of 1812, engineering the American victory at New Orleans. James K. Polk rebuffed an invasion from Mexico and acquired the entire American southwest in the Mexican-American War. Franklin Roosevelt mobilized America to defeat fascism, turning the U.S. into a world superpower in the process. Harry Truman created the Marshall Plan–which stopped the spread of Communism in Europe– and he took the initiative in establishing NATO. John Kennedy stood up to the USSR during the Cuban Missile Crisis and in Southeast Asia. Bill Clinton negotiated the historic Oslo Accords between Israel and Palestine, and he helped to both end the violence in Northern Ireland and the genocide in Kosovo.

Of course, this is only the tip of the iceberg. And, of course, this isn’t to say that other political parties haven’t helped people or made this country better. But I doubt there is anyone in this country who can reasonably claim that the Democratic Party has not made their lives better in some way, and I wanted to take some time to point that out.

UPDATED: Happy Thanksgiving from President-Elect Barack Obama:

Comments Off


Grijalva For Interior Secretary?

It’s a possibility:

Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz., has emerged as a leading contender for secretary of the Interior.

Grijalva, 60, is Tucson native and son of an immigrant Mexican farmworker. He served as Hispanic co-chair for Obama’s presidential campaign and has been a fierce critic of the Bush administration’s environmental policies. He serves on the House Committee on Natural Resources, and chairs the National Parks, Forests and Public Lands Subcommittee.

[...]

Last month, Grijalva issued a scathing report titled, The Bush Administration’s Assaults on Our National Parks, Forests and Public Lands. The 23-page critique accuses the President of carrying out “a concerted strategy” of reducing the protections for federal properties, “opening up these lands for every type of private, commercial and extractive industry possible.”

[...]

He has long been regarded as an environmental advocate, leading efforts to regulate hard-rock mining and establish a National Landscape Conservation System. He recently told The Arizona Republic that Bush’s administration sold away public resources to private interests, performing “more like real-estate agents than stewards of (public) lands.”

Everything I know about Grijalva tells me that he would be a fantastic choice; he has a strong environmental record that would lead to a complete turnaround the Bush administration’s environmental policies.

Plus, Grijalva is a dyed-in-the-wool progressive–in fact, he was just elected (along with Rep. Lynn Woolsey) to head the House Progressive Caucus.  While I’ve been happy with a lot of Obama’s cabinet picks, I’m glad to see that there are some stronger progressives being considered.

Comments Off


BREAKING: Waxman Defeats Dingell

Image from Firedoglake

Roll Call reports:

Rep. Henry Waxman (Calif.) has ousted Energy and Commerce Chairman John Dingell (Mich.), as Democratic lawmakers voted 137-122 Thursday morning to hand the gavel of the powerhouse panel to its second-ranking member.

With Waxman heading that committee we’ll now have a chance to pass some much-needed progressive energy legislation.

Comments Off


Yes We Can

John McCain has been asking, is he ready to lead?

Tonight, Barack Obama removed all doubt: yes, he is.

Here are his full remarks from Invesco Field in Denver, Colorado:

To Chairman Dean and my great friend Dick Durbin; and to all my fellow citizens of this great nation;

With profound gratitude and great humility, I accept your nomination for the presidency of the United States.

Let me express my thanks to the historic slate of candidates who accompanied me on this journey, and especially the one who traveled the farthest – a champion for working Americans and an inspiration to my daughters and to yours — Hillary Rodham Clinton. To President Clinton, who last night made the case for change as only he can make it; to Ted Kennedy, who embodies the spirit of service; and to the next Vice President of the United States, Joe Biden, I thank you. I am grateful to finish this journey with one of the finest statesmen of our time, a man at ease with everyone from world leaders to the conductors on the Amtrak train he still takes home every night.

To the love of my life, our next First Lady, Michelle Obama, and to Sasha and Malia – I love you so much, and I’m so proud of all of you.

Four years ago, I stood before you and told you my story – of the brief union between a young man from Kenya and a young woman from Kansas who weren’t well-off or well-known, but shared a belief that in America, their son could achieve whatever he put his mind to.

It is that promise that has always set this country apart – that through hard work and sacrifice, each of us can pursue our individual dreams but still come together as one American family, to ensure that the next generation can pursue their dreams as well.

That’s why I stand here tonight. Because for two hundred and thirty two years, at each moment when that promise was in jeopardy, ordinary men and women – students and soldiers, farmers and teachers, nurses and janitors — found the courage to keep it alive.

We meet at one of those defining moments – a moment when our nation is at war, our economy is in turmoil, and the American promise has been threatened once more.

Tonight, more Americans are out of work and more are working harder for less. More of you have lost your homes and even more are watching your home values plummet. More of you have cars you can’t afford to drive, credit card bills you can’t afford to pay, and tuition that’s beyond your reach.

These challenges are not all of government’s making. But the failure to respond is a direct result of a broken politics in Washington and the failed policies of George W. Bush.

America, we are better than these last eight years. We are a better country than this.

This country is more decent than one where a woman in Ohio, on the brink of retirement, finds herself one illness away from disaster after a lifetime of hard work.

This country is more generous than one where a man in Indiana has to pack up the equipment he’s worked on for twenty years and watch it shipped off to China, and then chokes up as he explains how he felt like a failure when he went home to tell his family the news.

We are more compassionate than a government that lets veterans sleep on our streets and families slide into poverty; that sits on its hands while a major American city drowns before our eyes.

Tonight, I say to the American people, to Democrats and Republicans and Independents across this great land – enough! This moment – this election – is our chance to keep, in the 21st century, the American promise alive. Because next week, in Minnesota, the same party that brought you two terms of George Bush and Dick Cheney will ask this country for a third. And we are here because we love this country too much to let the next four years look like the last eight. On November 4th, we must stand up and say: “Eight is enough.”

Now let there be no doubt. The Republican nominee, John McCain, has worn the uniform of our country with bravery and distinction, and for that we owe him our gratitude and respect. And next week, we’ll also hear about those occasions when he’s broken with his party as evidence that he can deliver the change that we need.

But the record’s clear: John McCain has voted with George Bush ninety percent of the time. Senator McCain likes to talk about judgment, but really, what does it say about your judgment when you think George Bush has been right more than ninety percent of the time? I don’t know about you, but I’m not ready to take a ten percent chance on change.

The truth is, on issue after issue that would make a difference in your lives – on health care and education and the economy – Senator McCain has been anything but independent. He said that our economy has made “great progress” under this President. He said that the fundamentals of the economy are strong. And when one of his chief advisors – the man who wrote his economic plan – was talking about the anxiety Americans are feeling, he said that we were just suffering from a “mental recession,” and that we’ve become, and I quote, “a nation of whiners.”

A nation of whiners? Tell that to the proud auto workers at a Michigan plant who, after they found out it was closing, kept showing up every day and working as hard as ever, because they knew there were people who counted on the brakes that they made. Tell that to the military families who shoulder their burdens silently as they watch their loved ones leave for their third or fourth or fifth tour of duty. These are not whiners. They work hard and give back and keep going without complaint. These are the Americans that I know.

Now, I don’t believe that Senator McCain doesn’t care what’s going on in the lives of Americans. I just think he doesn’t know. Why else would he define middle-class as someone making under five million dollars a year? How else could he propose hundreds of billions in tax breaks for big corporations and oil companies but not one penny of tax relief to more than one hundred million Americans? How else could he offer a health care plan that would actually tax people’s benefits, or an education plan that would do nothing to help families pay for college, or a plan that would privatize Social Security and gamble your retirement?

It’s not because John McCain doesn’t care. It’s because John McCain doesn’t get it.

For over two decades, he’s subscribed to that old, discredited Republican philosophy – give more and more to those with the most and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else. In Washington, they call this the Ownership Society, but what it really means is – you’re on your own. Out of work? Tough luck. No health care? The market will fix it. Born into poverty? Pull yourself up by your own bootstraps – even if you don’t have boots. You’re on your own.

Well it’s time for them to own their failure. It’s time for us to change America.

You see, we Democrats have a very different measure of what constitutes progress in this country.

We measure progress by how many people can find a job that pays the mortgage; whether you can put a little extra money away at the end of each month so you can someday watch your child receive her college diploma. We measure progress in the 23 million new jobs that were created when Bill Clinton was President – when the average American family saw its income go up $7,500 instead of down $2,000 like it has under George Bush.

We measure the strength of our economy not by the number of billionaires we have or the profits of the Fortune 500, but by whether someone with a good idea can take a risk and start a new business, or whether the waitress who lives on tips can take a day off to look after a sick kid without losing her job – an economy that honors the dignity of work.

The fundamentals we use to measure economic strength are whether we are living up to that fundamental promise that has made this country great – a promise that is the only reason I am standing here tonight.

Because in the faces of those young veterans who come back from Iraq and Afghanistan, I see my grandfather, who signed up after Pearl Harbor, marched in Patton’s Army, and was rewarded by a grateful nation with the chance to go to college on the GI Bill.

In the face of that young student who sleeps just three hours before working the night shift, I think about my mom, who raised my sister and me on her own while she worked and earned her degree; who once turned to food stamps but was still able to send us to the best schools in the country with the help of student loans and scholarships.

When I listen to another worker tell me that his factory has shut down, I remember all those men and women on the South Side of Chicago who I stood by and fought for two decades ago after the local steel plant closed.

And when I hear a woman talk about the difficulties of starting her own business, I think about my grandmother, who worked her way up from the secretarial pool to middle-management, despite years of being passed over for promotions because she was a woman. She’s the one who taught me about hard work. She’s the one who put off buying a new car or a new dress for herself so that I could have a better life. She poured everything she had into me. And although she can no longer travel, I know that she’s watching tonight, and that tonight is her night as well.

I don’t know what kind of lives John McCain thinks that celebrities lead, but this has been mine. These are my heroes. Theirs are the stories that shaped me. And it is on their behalf that I intend to win this election and keep our promise alive as President of the United States.

What is that promise?

It’s a promise that says each of us has the freedom to make of our own lives what we will, but that we also have the obligation to treat each other with dignity and respect.

It’s a promise that says the market should reward drive and innovation and generate growth, but that businesses should live up to their responsibilities to create American jobs, look out for American workers, and play by the rules of the road.

Ours is a promise that says government cannot solve all our problems, but what it should do is that which we cannot do for ourselves – protect us from harm and provide every child a decent education; keep our water clean and our toys safe; invest in new schools and new roads and new science and technology.

Our government should work for us, not against us. It should help us, not hurt us. It should ensure opportunity not just for those with the most money and influence, but for every American who’s willing to work.

That’s the promise of America – the idea that we are responsible for ourselves, but that we also rise or fall as one nation; the fundamental belief that I am my brother’s keeper; I am my sister’s keeper.

That’s the promise we need to keep. That’s the change we need right now. So let me spell out exactly what that change would mean if I am President.

Change means a tax code that doesn’t reward the lobbyists who wrote it, but the American workers and small businesses who deserve it.

Unlike John McCain, I will stop giving tax breaks to corporations that ship jobs overseas, and I will start giving them to companies that create good jobs right here in America.

I will eliminate capital gains taxes for the small businesses and the start-ups that will create the high-wage, high-tech jobs of tomorrow.

I will cut taxes – cut taxes – for 95% of all working families. Because in an economy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on the middle-class.

And for the sake of our economy, our security, and the future of our planet, I will set a clear goal as President: in ten years, we will finally end our dependence on oil from the Middle East.

Washington’s been talking about our oil addiction for the last thirty years, and John McCain has been there for twenty-six of them. In that time, he’s said no to higher fuel-efficiency standards for cars, no to investments in renewable energy, no to renewable fuels. And today, we import triple the amount of oil as the day that Senator McCain took office.

Now is the time to end this addiction, and to understand that drilling is a stop-gap measure, not a long-term solution. Not even close.

As President, I will tap our natural gas reserves, invest in clean coal technology, and find ways to safely harness nuclear power. I’ll help our auto companies re-tool, so that the fuel-efficient cars of the future are built right here in America. I’ll make it easier for the American people to afford these new cars. And I’ll invest 150 billion dollars over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources of energy – wind power and solar power and the next generation of biofuels; an investment that will lead to new industries and five million new jobs that pay well and can’t ever be outsourced.

America, now is not the time for small plans.

Now is the time to finally meet our moral obligation to provide every child a world-class education, because it will take nothing less to compete in the global economy. Michelle and I are only here tonight because we were given a chance at an education. And I will not settle for an America where some kids don’t have that chance. I’ll invest in early childhood education. I’ll recruit an army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more support. And in exchange, I’ll ask for higher standards and more accountability. And we will keep our promise to every young American – if you commit to serving your community or your country, we will make sure you can afford a college education.

Now is the time to finally keep the promise of affordable, accessible health care for every single American. If you have health care, my plan will lower your premiums. If you don’t, you’ll be able to get the same kind of coverage that members of Congress give themselves. And as someone who watched my mother argue with insurance companies while she lay in bed dying of cancer, I will make certain those companies stop discriminating against those who are sick and need care the most.

Now is the time to help families with paid sick days and better family leave, because nobody in America should have to choose between keeping their jobs and caring for a sick child or ailing parent.

Now is the time to change our bankruptcy laws, so that your pensions are protected ahead of CEO bonuses; and the time to protect Social Security for future generations.

And now is the time to keep the promise of equal pay for an equal day’s work, because I want my daughters to have exactly the same opportunities as your sons.

Now, many of these plans will cost money, which is why I’ve laid out how I’ll pay for every dime – by closing corporate loopholes and tax havens that don’t help America grow. But I will also go through the federal budget, line by line, eliminating programs that no longer work and making the ones we do need work better and cost less – because we cannot meet twenty-first century challenges with a twentieth century bureaucracy.

And Democrats, we must also admit that fulfilling America’s promise will require more than just money. It will require a renewed sense of responsibility from each of us to recover what John F. Kennedy called our “intellectual and moral strength.” Yes, government must lead on energy independence, but each of us must do our part to make our homes and businesses more efficient. Yes, we must provide more ladders to success for young men who fall into lives of crime and despair. But we must also admit that programs alone can’t replace parents; that government can’t turn off the television and make a child do her homework; that fathers must take more responsibility for providing the love and guidance their children need.

Individual responsibility and mutual responsibility – that’s the essence of America’s promise.

And just as we keep our keep our promise to the next generation here at home, so must we keep America’s promise abroad. If John McCain wants to have a debate about who has the temperament, and judgment, to serve as the next Commander-in-Chief, that’s a debate I’m ready to have.

For while Senator McCain was turning his sights to Iraq just days after 9/11, I stood up and opposed this war, knowing that it would distract us from the real threats we face. When John McCain said we could just “muddle through” in Afghanistan, I argued for more resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11, and made clear that we must take out Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants if we have them in our sights. John McCain likes to say that he’ll follow bin Laden to the Gates of Hell – but he won’t even go to the cave where he lives.

And today, as my call for a time frame to remove our troops from Iraq has been echoed by the Iraqi government and even the Bush Administration, even after we learned that Iraq has a $79 billion surplus while we’re wallowing in deficits, John McCain stands alone in his stubborn refusal to end a misguided war.

That’s not the judgment we need. That won’t keep America safe. We need a President who can face the threats of the future, not keep grasping at the ideas of the past.

You don’t defeat a terrorist network that operates in eighty countries by occupying Iraq. You don’t protect Israel and deter Iran just by talking tough in Washington. You can’t truly stand up for Georgia when you’ve strained our oldest alliances. If John McCain wants to follow George Bush with more tough talk and bad strategy, that is his choice – but it is not the change we need.

We are the party of Roosevelt. We are the party of Kennedy. So don’t tell me that Democrats won’t defend this country. Don’t tell me that Democrats won’t keep us safe. The Bush-McCain foreign policy has squandered the legacy that generations of Americans — Democrats and Republicans – have built, and we are here to restore that legacy.

As Commander-in-Chief, I will never hesitate to defend this nation, but I will only send our troops into harm’s way with a clear mission and a sacred commitment to give them the equipment they need in battle and the care and benefits they deserve when they come home.

I will end this war in Iraq responsibly, and finish the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan. I will rebuild our military to meet future conflicts. But I will also renew the tough, direct diplomacy that can prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and curb Russian aggression. I will build new partnerships to defeat the threats of the 21st century: terrorism and nuclear proliferation; poverty and genocide; climate change and disease. And I will restore our moral standing, so that America is once again that last, best hope for all who are called to the cause of freedom, who long for lives of peace, and who yearn for a better future.

These are the policies I will pursue. And in the weeks ahead, I look forward to debating them with John McCain.

But what I will not do is suggest that the Senator takes his positions for political purposes. Because one of the things that we have to change in our politics is the idea that people cannot disagree without challenging each other’s character and patriotism.

The times are too serious, the stakes are too high for this same partisan playbook. So let us agree that patriotism has no party. I love this country, and so do you, and so does John McCain. The men and women who serve in our battlefields may be Democrats and Republicans and Independents, but they have fought together and bled together and some died together under the same proud flag. They have not served a Red America or a Blue America – they have served the United States of America.

So I’ve got news for you, John McCain. We all put our country first.

America, our work will not be easy. The challenges we face require tough choices, and Democrats as well as Republicans will need to cast off the worn-out ideas and politics of the past. For part of what has been lost these past eight years can’t just be measured by lost wages or bigger trade deficits. What has also been lost is our sense of common purpose – our sense of higher purpose. And that’s what we have to restore.

We may not agree on abortion, but surely we can agree on reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies in this country. The reality of gun ownership may be different for hunters in rural Ohio than for those plagued by gang-violence in Cleveland, but don’t tell me we can’t uphold the Second Amendment while keeping AK-47s out of the hands of criminals. I know there are differences on same-sex marriage, but surely we can agree that our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters deserve to visit the person they love in the hospital and to live lives free of discrimination. Passions fly on immigration, but I don’t know anyone who benefits when a mother is separated from her infant child or an employer undercuts American wages by hiring illegal workers. This too is part of America’s promise – the promise of a democracy where we can find the strength and grace to bridge divides and unite in common effort.

I know there are those who dismiss such beliefs as happy talk. They claim that our insistence on something larger, something firmer and more honest in our public life is just a Trojan Horse for higher taxes and the abandonment of traditional values. And that’s to be expected. Because if you don’t have any fresh ideas, then you use stale tactics to scare the voters. If you don’t have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone people should run from.

You make a big election about small things.

And you know what – it’s worked before. Because it feeds into the cynicism we all have about government. When Washington doesn’t work, all its promises seem empty. If your hopes have been dashed again and again, then it’s best to stop hoping, and settle for what you already know.

I get it. I realize that I am not the likeliest candidate for this office. I don’t fit the typical pedigree, and I haven’t spent my career in the halls of Washington.

But I stand before you tonight because all across America something is stirring. What the nay-sayers don’t understand is that this election has never been about me. It’s been about you.

For eighteen long months, you have stood up, one by one, and said enough to the politics of the past. You understand that in this election, the greatest risk we can take is to try the same old politics with the same old players and expect a different result. You have shown what history teaches us – that at defining moments like this one, the change we need doesn’t come from Washington. Change comes to Washington. Change happens because the American people demand it – because they rise up and insist on new ideas and new leadership, a new politics for a new time.

America, this is one of those moments.

I believe that as hard as it will be, the change we need is coming. Because I’ve seen it. Because I’ve lived it. I’ve seen it in Illinois, when we provided health care to more children and moved more families from welfare to work. I’ve seen it in Washington, when we worked across party lines to open up government and hold lobbyists more accountable, to give better care for our veterans and keep nuclear weapons out of terrorist hands.

And I’ve seen it in this campaign. In the young people who voted for the first time, and in those who got involved again after a very long time. In the Republicans who never thought they’d pick up a Democratic ballot, but did. I’ve seen it in the workers who would rather cut their hours back a day than see their friends lose their jobs, in the soldiers who re-enlist after losing a limb, in the good neighbors who take a stranger in when a hurricane strikes and the floodwaters rise.

This country of ours has more wealth than any nation, but that’s not what makes us rich. We have the most powerful military on Earth, but that’s not what makes us strong. Our universities and our culture are the envy of the world, but that’s not what keeps the world coming to our shores.

Instead, it is that American spirit – that American promise – that pushes us forward even when the path is uncertain; that binds us together in spite of our differences; that makes us fix our eye not on what is seen, but what is unseen, that better place around the bend.

That promise is our greatest inheritance. It’s a promise I make to my daughters when I tuck them in at night, and a promise that you make to yours – a promise that has led immigrants to cross oceans and pioneers to travel west; a promise that led workers to picket lines, and women to reach for the ballot.

And it is that promise that forty five years ago today, brought Americans from every corner of this land to stand together on a Mall in Washington, before Lincoln’s Memorial, and hear a young preacher from Georgia speak of his dream.

The men and women who gathered there could’ve heard many things. They could’ve heard words of anger and discord. They could’ve been told to succumb to the fear and frustration of so many dreams deferred.

But what the people heard instead – people of every creed and color, from every walk of life – is that in America, our destiny is inextricably linked. That together, our dreams can be one.

“We cannot walk alone,” the preacher cried. “And as we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead. We cannot turn back.”

America, we cannot turn back. Not with so much work to be done. Not with so many children to educate, and so many veterans to care for. Not with an economy to fix and cities to rebuild and farms to save. Not with so many families to protect and so many lives to mend. America, we cannot turn back. We cannot walk alone. At this moment, in this election, we must pledge once more to march into the future. Let us keep that promise – that American promise – and in the words of Scripture hold firmly, without wavering, to the hope that we confess.

Thank you, God Bless you, and God Bless the United States of America.

Comments Off


Kicking The Habit

The problem

The solution

America is addicted to oil.  No matter how high prices climb, we keep coming back for more.

What’s John McCain’s solution?

He says we don’t need to end our addiction–we just need to find cheaper dope.

But the American people know better than that.  We know we need to kick our habit, and we know that it can be done if we  invest in alternative energy–in geothermal, biodiesel, solar, wind and hydroelectric energy.

McCain and the Republicans say it can’t be done.  They say we need to drill more, to rely on coal and oil and gas, to use nuclear power.  They say we can’t develop new technologies, so we should rely on the technologies of the past–finite technologies, flawed technologies, band-aids to our energy crisis.

Years ago, America used to be the world leader in science and technology.  We’ve since lost that status, but the energy crisis has given us an opportunity to change that.  By investing in alternative energy sources, we can both create new jobs and put America back in it’s rightful place as the world’s technological  superpower.

John McCain and the Republicans say no we can’t.  Barack Obama and the American people say yes we can, and working together we will end America’s addiction to oil once and for all.



Band-Aid Economics

Today’s Electoral Map (from FiveThirtyEight): Obama 307.1 EV ; McCain 230.9 EV

Today, President Bush lifted the ban on offshore oil drilling.

Problem is, offshore drilling, ANWR, all of these are just band-aid solutions.  The problem with the price of oil–and much of our economic woes–is oil itself.  America is addicted to oil, particularly foreign oil, and spending billions of dollars digging around to find our next fix won’t cut it.

What America needs is alternative sources of energy.  What America needs is to restore our rightful place as the world’s technological innovator.  The Republican disregard for science–particularly when it comes to alternative energy–is hurting the American people economically.  It’s time we kick our dead-end addiction to oil once and for all.  It’s time we get rid of high prices at the pump–and, for that matter, the pump itself.  With the billions that will be inevitably spent on offshore drilling, we could have invested in technologies that would make gas itself obsolete.

Then again, band-aids and pipe dreams have been the keystone of Republican politics for years now.  Fantasizing about goals that they can’t achieve in order to sell us short-sighted policies is par for the course with the GOP.  More drilling, no matter where it is, won’t change the fact that the oil market is inherently flawed, and that the price of oil will continue to rise as long as we’re consuming oil.

John McCain has already shown his Bushean tendency band-aids and pipe dreams in his economic plan, which makes promises that–even under the rosiest scenarios–are impossible to fulfill:

SEN. JOHN McCain says that President McCain would balance the federal budget by 2013. The plan is not credible.

The Congressional Budget Office projects a deficit of $443 billion in 2013 if President Bush’s tax cuts are extended, as Mr. McCain wants, and the alternative minimum tax is merely patched to make certain it does not hit growing numbers of taxpayers. But Mr. McCain is proposing far more tax cuts. The only way he avoids having them add hundreds of billions more to the deficit in 2013 is by phasing them in and adding other caveats. Mr. McCain says on the campaign trail that he would repeal, rather than merely adjust, the alternative minimum tax, slash the corporate tax rate, now 35 percent, to 25 percent, and double the exemption for dependents. It turns out that none of that would be fully implemented by the end of the first McCain term. The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center estimates the extra cost of the scaled-back plan at $47 billion in 2013, bringing the deficit to a daunting $490 billion. Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign claims it would be far higher, somewhere between $650 billion and $750 billion.

The McCain campaign says it will fill the hole with spending cuts. It would “reclaim billions” by rooting out existing earmarks and prohibiting new ones; impose a one-year freeze on discretionary spending other than for defense and veterans; and “reserve all savings from victory in the Iraq and Afghanistan operations” to use toward deficit reduction. These claimed savings are illusory.

That’s John McCain, George Bush and the GOP for you–if you can’t make it happen, lie and say you can.  Make up savings, make up profits, make up economic benefits that you know will never, ever happen. Remember the start of the Iraq war? They told us we’d be there for six months and that Iraq’s oil revenue would make us money in the end, and none of that turned out to be true in the least.

Face it, the Republicans have lost all credibility.  Bush’s offshore oil drilling scam and McCain’s unworkable economic plan are proof of this.

It’s high time for us to put our faith in common-sense Democratic solutions instead of ineffective Republican band-aids, so that we can solve our (Republican-created) economic problems once and for all.

Comments Off


Game On

We are all Democrats.

We are all on the same team, now.

Today, Biden supporters, Kucinich supporters, Richardson supporters, Dodd supporters, Vilsack supporters, Gravel supporters, Edwards supporters and Clinton supporters are now all Obama supporters

We all believe in fixing our economy, in ending this war, in providing health care to all, in taking care of our veterans, in ending global warming, in creating new jobs, in restoring our constitution and fixing this great country of ours.

As Hillary Clinton said today, the stakes are too high. John McCain supports in the same policies, the same ideas, the same disastrous decisions that George W. Bush does. John McCain stands with George Bush and wants to make George Bush’s policies permanent. America cannot afford a third Bush term; America cannot afford John McCain.

Today, the real fight begins. It’s Barack Obama vs. John McCain, fighting for nothing less than the future of this great country of ours.

We’re united. We’re ready. Republicans, you better be prepared–millions of Americans are ready to send Barack Obama to the White House, and we’re going to stop at nothing to ensure that your deathgrip on this beautiful country of ours comes to an end, once and for all.

All together now: Barack Obama for President!

All together now: Yes We Can!

Game on.



Patriotism Is…

Today, Barack Obama is being attacked by the right-wing noise machine. His latest dreamt-up offense? Not wearing an American flag lapel pin, which apparently makes him unpatriotic.

Of course, anyone with $2 in their pocket can wear an American flag pin, regardless of what they believe. In fact, how many politicians have worn that pin while tearing down nearly everything this great country stands for?

Patriotism isn’t defined by what we wear–it’s defined by what we do. And through his actions, Barack Obama has shown us what true patriotism is:

Patriotism is standing up for our Constitutional rights against a corrupt, power-hungry White House.

Patriotism is bringing our troops home and making sure they’re taken care of when they get here.

Patriotism is standing up for America’s working class, giving them living wage and a good standard of living.

Patriotism is making sure Americans have access to health care regardless of their income.

Patriotism is standing up to polluters to preserve this beautiful country for future generations.

Patriotism is securing our borders while helping immigrants become citizens.

Patriotism is fighting for clean, open government that’s held accountable to the people.

Patriotism is helping Americans keep their homes by standing up to predatory lenders.

Patriotism is standing up to keep weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of terrorist groups.

Patriotism isn’t wearing a $1.75 American flag lapel pin made on a Chinese assembly line.

So, Barack Obama doesn’t wear a flag lapel pin. But you know what? Neither does Mitt Romney. Or John McCain. Or Mike Huckabee. Or John Boehner. Or Mitch McConnell. Or RNC Chair Mike Duncan. And neither did Newt Gingrich. Or Tom DeLay. Or Bill Frist. Or even Ronald Reagan, for that matter.

So let’s put this half-baked smear to bed once and for all, because America deserves better than right-wing gutter politics.

Image from The Washington Post



Gore Will Not Endorse

From CNN:

He’s the most prominent Democrat yet to take a side in the presidential election, but two sources close to Al Gore tell us not to expect the former vice president to endorse either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama any time during the primary season.

The sources say Gore talks with both Clinton and Obama, and is on good terms with both. But with Sen. John Kerry and Bill Clinton both aligned to a candidate, Gore has a role to serve as the neutral elder statesman in the party.

If an agreement needs to be struck between Clinton and Obama down the road, Gore is in position to be the likely facilitator of that discussion.

Gore also will want to work closely with whoever wins the nomination to promote an environmental agenda.

And why would he? His last endorsemet–Howard Dean in 2004–didn’t pan out exactly as he planned.  And though he’s far more influential this time around, having re-invented himself and devoted himself to environmental activism, why would he jeopardize his work toward ending global warming by jumping into an intra-party fight?

The fact that Gore opted out of running this year–despite the fact that he could have had a good shot at winning the Democratic nomination–shows that he has no interest in  Presidential politics.  Endorsing someone wouldn’t do him any good–Gore will stump for the Democratic nominee regardless, and if the next President is a Democrat it’s guaranteed he’ll have his/her ear–but it could hurt him by putting his good work in jeopardy.  If he backs one candidate, the other candidate’s supporters will stop seeing him in a positive light; if he back the losing candidate, he runs the risk of being shut out.

So, I wouldn’t expect a Gore endorsement anytime soon.  On the other hand, John Edwards has begun to send some signals

Comments Off