Democrashield.com


Why Are We Supposed To Trust These Guys With Health Care, Again? (UPDATED)

Republican Congressman–and former House Minority Whip–Roy Blunt says this about health care reform:

Well, you could certainly argue that government should have never have gotten in the health care business, and that might have been the best argument of all, to figure out how people could have had more access to a competitive marketplace.

Government did get into the health care business in a big way in 1965 with Medicare, and later with Medicaid, and government already distorts the marketplace.

That’s brilliant Republican policy for you: not only should we not reform health care, but we should eliminate government-provided forms of health care like Medicare and Medicaid.

Because eliminating Medicare and Medicaid is really going to fix the health care crisis, isn’t it?

UPDATE: And where can you get some of the best medical care in America?

At the government-funded Veterans Health Administration:

Yet here’s a curious fact that few conservatives or liberals know. Who do you think receives higher-quality health care. Medicare patients who are free to pick their own doctors and specialists? Or aging veterans stuck in those presumably filthy VA hospitals with their antiquated equipment, uncaring administrators, and incompetent staff? An answer came in 2003, when the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine published a study that compared veterans health facilities on 11 measures of quality with fee-for-service Medicare. On all 11 measures, the quality of care in veterans facilities proved to be “significantly better.”

Here’s another curious fact. The Annals of Internal Medicine recently published a study that compared veterans health facilities with commercial managed-care systems in their treatment of diabetes patients. In seven out of seven measures of quality, the VA provided better care.

[...]

But when it comes to health care, it’s a government bureaucracy that’s setting the standard for maintaining best practices while reducing costs, and it’s the private sector that’s lagging in quality. That unexpected reality needs examining if we’re to have any hope of understanding what’s wrong with America’s health-care system and how to fix it. It turns out that precisely because the VHA is a big, government-run system that has nearly a lifetime relationship with its patients, it has incentives for investing in quality and keeping its patients well–incentives that are lacking in for-profit medicine.

[Emphasis added]



Carolyn Maloney Will Primary Kirsten Gillibrand

PRIME

Even more big primary news today–NY Rep. Carolyn Maloney will mount a primary challenge against Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who was appointed by the very unpopular Governor Paterson to replace Hillary Clinton:

An adviser to Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) confirmed Wednesday that the congresswoman will enter the state’s Senate primary against appointed Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).

Paul Blank, who works with Democratic consultant Joe Trippi’s firm, said Maloney is officially in the race. Blank is set to serve as a top adviser for her Senate campaign.

“Congresswoman Maloney has made her decision,” Blank said. “She believes times are too tough and our challenges too important for politics as usual.

He added: “Congresswoman Maloney is putting together a campaign team and will make her announcement in two weeks.”

[...]

It might not matter, though, as the GOP doesn’t appear close to landing a big-name candidate. Rep. Pete King (R-N.Y.) said in recent days that he is leaning against running now that he has landed a spot on the House Intelligence Committee. Former Gov. George Pataki (R) is also weighing a run but is not expected to make a bid. A new Marist poll, coincidentally released Wednesday, showed Maloney leading Gillibrand within the margin of error, 38-37. Gillibrand is still unknown to about one-third of voters.

[Emphasis mine]

Maloney’s strength isn’t surprising–she was widely rumored to be eying a Senate run in 2000 before Clinton stepped in, and the district she represents is more populous than Gillibrand’s upstate district was; she has also been serving in Congress since 1993 (as opposed to Gillibrand, who took her seat in 2007).

I don’t have strong opinions on either Gillibrand or Maloney, but considering the GOP’s recruiting failure I don’t see how a primary will hurt–putting pressure on our elected officials to represent their people better is never a bad thing.

Comments Off


Joe Sestak Will Primary Arlen Specter

PRIMARYYYY

Congressman Joe Sestak has decided that he will mount a primary challenge against newly-minted Democratic Senator Arlen Specter:

Wayne County, Pa. – A congressman from the Philadelphia suburbs will challenge U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter in the Democratic Senate primary.

In an interview with The Wayne Independent Wednesday morning, U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Pa.,confirmed his intention to run against Specter, a long-time Republican who switched to the Democratic party earlier this year.

I am going to get into the race against Arlen Specter … for senator,” said Sestak in his first media interview as part of a three-week tour through all of the Commonwealth’s 67 counties.

[Emphasis mine]

I’m glad to see Sestak enter the race against Specter, because no matter who emerges victorious from the Democratic primary we will be in better shape for it.

Honestly, I’m no fan of Arlen Specter–I would rather have an actual Democrat like Joe Sestak in that seat than someone who only became a Democrat to save his otherwise-doomed career.

Plus–as we learned when Pat Toomey was mounting a challenge against Republican Senator Specter–Arlen Specter is highly susceptible to partisan pressure.  It’s likely that–if he believes Sestak has a shot at beating him–he’s going to start towing the Democratic line more often in order to ensure he wins the primary.

In other words, no matter who wins, we all win–either we end up with a more progressive Democratic candidate or we pressure Specter into being a more progressive Democratic candidate.

So I say welcome to the race, Congressman Sestak.

Comments Off


More White Flags

Newt Gingrich is walking back his smear of Judge Sotomayor as ‘racist’:

My initial reaction was strong and direct — perhaps too strong and too direct. The sentiment struck me as racist and I said so. Since then, some who want to have an open and honest consideration of Judge Sotomayor’s fitness to serve on the nation’s highest court have been critical of my word choice.

With these critics who want to have an honest conversation, I agree. The word “racist” should not have been applied to Judge Sotomayor as a person, even if her words themselves are unacceptable (a fact which both President Obama and his Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs, have since admitted).

[Emphasis mine]

Hear that, Republicans? It’s the sound of your opposition campaign against Judge Sotomayor imploding.

Comments Off


GOP Rebrading Fail (UPDATED With More Fail)

This quote, from this past weekend’s GOP rebranding tour kickoff, is one of my favorite Republican quotes of all time:

[Republicans] are the party of the revolutionaries, [Democrats] are the party of the monarchists.

Let’s review Modern American History 101:

Our most recent Republican president was the son of a former Republican president, who himself was the son of a wealthy, well-connected Wall Street executive/United States Senator.

To contrast, our two most recent Democratic presidents were born into relative poverty and raised by single mothers, achieving success on their own without either inherited wealth or family connections to help them.

Oh, and that quote up there? That’s from former Massachusetts governor and Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who is the son of former Michigan governor and Republican presidential candidate George Romney.

And thus the GOP rebranding effort fails right out of the gate as Republicans try to defy reality itself.

Bonus amazing quote from former GOP Whip Roy Blunt:

Just because we’re in a situation now where we vote no doesn’t mean we are the ‘party of no’ or have no ideas

Actually, yes, that’s exactly what that means; when you oppose the President’s agenda at every turn and offer nothing but warmed-over half-cooked non-alternatives, that makes you the Party of No with no ideas.

UPDATE: More about the aforementioned GOP rebranding kickoff:

GOP holds “Outside the Beltway” rebranding event inside the beltway

As part of the Republican Party’s rebranding effort, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) hosted a National Council for a New America event at a pizza shop over the weekend. Roll Call reported, “Cantor said the idea of the road show is to gather ideas from outside the Beltway to shape the Republican agenda.”

[...]

At the risk of sounding picky, it’s probably worth noting that Republicans started gathering ideas “from outside the Beltway” at an event inside the Beltway.

A place called Pie-tanza, in an Arlington strip mall, hosted the event. Pie-tanza is just a few minutes from the Washington Golf and Country Club. Indeed, it’s only about six miles from Capitol Hill.

[Emphasis mine]

UPDATE II: Also, different event but same kind of fail:

GOP turns to Bush aides for advice

Republicans looking to recover from Bush-era defeats are turning to an unlikely source for advice: top aides to former President George W. Bush.

They really are out of ideas, aren’t they? Bush & co. drove the GOP into the ground but the only people they could think to ask for advice are Bush & co.

UPDATE III: Speaking of the usual suspects, guess who’s leading the aforementioned GOP rebranding effort:

[T]the House Minority Leader, the Minority Whip, the Senate Minority Leader and last year’s Republican presidential nominee[,] Mitt Romney (R), Bobby Jindal (R), Haley Barbour (R), John Cornyn (R), and … wait for it … Jeb Bush (R).

They’re calling themselves “The National Council for a New America.” Funny, they look and sound just like the old America that got whipped at the polls. Twice.

Comments Off


Michael Steele, Loser

He couldn’t even pull off a win in the heavily-Republican NY-20. I wonder how long the members of the RNC will let him keep running their party into the ground– I bet a lot of them have some pretty serious buyer’s remorse right now.

And, of course, congratulations Congressman-elect Murphy.

Comments Off


The Era Of Big Government…

…is still popular.

After passing the conservative-dubbed spendulus/porkulus/Generational Theft Act of 2009, Congress is…the most popular it’s been in more than 4 years:

Americans’ job approval rating of Congress is up an additional 8 points this month, after a 12-point increase last month, and now stands at 39% — the most positive assessment of Congress since February 2005.

[Emphasis mine]

picture-10

Congress’ popularity is up among all groups, but mostly among Democrats and Independents:

gallup02

So, what does this tell us? First, conservatives are far outside the mainstream–they spent weeks maligning the economic stimulus package, only to see Congress’ approval ratings shoot up after it was passed.

Second, despite all the right-wing gibbering about socialism or deficits or whatever their latest talking point is, the American people clearly want to see their government doing something about the economic crisis.  Part of the reason why Congress was so unpopular between 2007 and early 2009 was because, with a Republican President, very little got done.  Now that Bush is gone, Congress and the President are finally getting to work solving some of our nation’s most pressing problems, and clearly the American people appreciate that.

Keep doing what you’re doing, Congress; taking action and being effective is the best way to refute garbage right-wing talking points.

Comments Off


Tinfoil Hattery

Here’s the stupidest thing you’ll read today: House Minority Leader John Boehner says that Rush Limbaugh is in the news right now because of…the Democrats!

That’s right. According to the most powerful Republican in the House of Representatives:

Rush Limbaugh saying he hopes President Obama fails? Democrats’ fault.

Rush Limbaugh being selected as the keynote speaker for CPAC? Democrats’ fault.

Michael Steele criticizing Rush Limbaugh? Democrats’ fault.

Rush Limbaugh attacking Michael Steele? Democrats’ fault.

Michael Steele’s apology to Rush Limbaugh? Democrats’ fault.

Rush Limbaugh challenging President Obama to a debate? Democrats’ fault.

Whatever wacky thing Rush Limbaugh does next? I’m sure that will be the Democrats’ fault, too.

Actually, John, Rush Limbaugh is a big deal right now because of you. You, Michael Steele and Mitch McConnell are such poor leaders that you’ve left a power vacuum in your party, a vacuum that attention-hungry, money-hungry Limbaugh is more than happy to fill.

If one of you actually stepped up and led the Republican Party (maybe you could start by putting Limbaugh in his place) then Limbaugh wouldn’t be able to do what he’s doing. But, as usual, you and your fellow Republicans are happy to live in a fantasyland where your failures are all everyone else’s fault.

It’s a sad, sad day for the Republican Party when nobody has the guts to stand up to an unelected entertainer, someone who is a half-step above being a shock jock.

Comments Off


Gimmickry

Conservative blogger Patrick Ruffini discusses Sam “Joe the Plumber” Wurzelbacher:

Joe the Plumber — a one or two day campaign gimmick — has become a poster boy for conservatism. To say that the McCain campaign milked Joe Wurzelbacher’s story and then some would be the understatement of the century. Now, conservatives are making him a foreign war correspondent and he is sure to be feted at CPAC — so I’m sure to get a certain amount of grief for what I’m writing now.

If you want to get a sense of how unserious and ungrounded most Americans think the Republican Party is, look no further than how conservatives elevate Joe the Plumber as a spokesman. The movement has become so gimmick-driven that Wurzelbacher will be a conservative hero long after people have forgotten what his legitimate policy beef with Obama was.

I think “gimmick-driven” is, quite possibly, the most astute criticism of the Republican Party I have ever heard.

Remember when John McCain “suspended” his Presidential campaign to fly to Washington and fix the economic crisis? Remember when McCain chose Sarah Palin to be his running mate?

Remember the GOP’s response to the economic stimulus package, which turned into a never-ending circus of embarrassing political gimmicks? Republican lawmakers complained about how many pages the bill was, even though—obviously—the length of a bill has no impact whatsoever on whether or not it’s a good piece of legislation. They complained about the cost of the bill, which would have been a worthy criticism had they not made it in the stupidest way possible, gabbing on about how high a stack of 1 trillion $1 bills would reach or how, if you spent a million dollars a day since the birth of Jesus, you wouldn’t spend as much money as was contained in that bill.

Yes, the stimulus bill had a big price tag, but nobody was trying to hide it. President Obama and the Democrats said from the start that we needed a large stimulus package; it wasn’t like everyone needed the GOP to tell them what the bill cost.

The sheer cost of the bill wasn’t important; what was important was the return on investment, how much economic growth that money would create. In the end, the GOP gave no coherent, worthwhile reason to oppose the bill. Where was their economics?

The list of gimmicks goes on and on: embracing Twitter as quick-fix to their poor messaging, hosting pointless “tea parties,” forcing a Michael Steele hip-GOP image makeover, etc. The right is hoping they’ll stumble across a magic bullet that will rocket them back into the majority, which is the kind of short-sighted, shallow thinking that’s going to keep them in the minority.

As Ruffini says,

Conservatives should not need Joe the Plumber to prove their middle class bona fides. We are naturally the party of the middle, and we don’t need gimmicks to prove it.

I agree with part of Ruffini’s point–the GOP shouldn’t need gimmicks, their policies should  be able to speak for themselves.  For instance, picking a random middle-class person to read your talking points doesn’t prove you’re the party of the middle class; embracing policies that help the middle class prove you’re the party of the middle class.

Somewhere along the way, Republicans forgot that the underpinning of politics is policy and they jettisoned political substance in favor of whatever stunt they hope will win the day’s news cycle.  Getting the conservative movement to kick it’s gimmickry habit and getting them to be serious once again should be the first step toward any kind of Republican revival.



Pork!

Remember the weeks-long Republican campaign to derail the economic stimulus package? Remember all the ranting about “pork” and complaining about “wasteful spending dressed in ’stimulus’ clothes“? Remember the Republicans complaining that it was”generational theft“  “larded up with wasteful spending“?

Well, turns out the Republicans have no problem with wasteful spending when it benefits them:

A ten percent increase in the budget for Congressional operations was needed because Senate Republicans wanted to retain previous staff levels despite having lost roughly 20 percent of their ranks in the 2008 elections, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said Wednesday.

[...]

Reid, asked about the increase at a press conference, initially dodged the question, speaking instead about spending in general.

The unsatisfied reporter repeated the question about a ten percent raise for the congressional budget. “How is that going to help get out of the depression?” she pressed.

Don’t blame us, said Reid.

“We had a situation — you should direct that question to Senator McConnell,” he said, referring to the Senate Minority Leader, “because we had trouble organizing this year. He wanted to maintain a lot of their staffing even though they had lost huge numbers. And the only way we could get it done is to do what we did. So you should direct that question to Senator McConnell.”

A McConnell spokesman didn’t immediately return a phone call.

Oh, the hypocrisy.

So, according to Republican logic, spending money to help the American people through an economic crisis is wasteful pork that should be opposed at all costs, yet spending a couple billion dollars to give Congressional Republicans bigger staffs is a completely worthwhile and necessary expense.

When it comes to helping you, the GOP is the Party of No.  But when it comes to helping themselves, the GOP is the Party of Gimmie Gimmie Gimmie. ‘Let them eat cake’ indeed.

Comments Off


President Obama’s Speech To The Nation (UPDATED)

Here is the full text of President Barack Obama’s speech to be delivered this evening before a joint session of Congress:

Remarks of President Barack Obama – As Prepared for Delivery

Address to Joint Session of Congress

Tuesday, February 24th, 2009

Madame Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, and the First Lady of the United States:

I’ve come here tonight not only to address the distinguished men and women in this great chamber, but to speak frankly and directly to the men and women who sent us here.

I know that for many Americans watching right now, the state of our economy is a concern that rises above all others. And rightly so. If you haven’t been personally affected by this recession, you probably know someone who has – a friend; a neighbor; a member of your family. You don’t need to hear another list of statistics to know that our economy is in crisis, because you live it every day. It’s the worry you wake up with and the source of sleepless nights. It’s the job you thought you’d retire from but now have lost; the business you built your dreams upon that’s now hanging by a thread; the college acceptance letter your child had to put back in the envelope. The impact of this recession is real, and it is everywhere.

But while our economy may be weakened and our confidence shaken; though we are living through difficult and uncertain times, tonight I want every American to know this:

We will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before.

The weight of this crisis will not determine the destiny of this nation. The answers to our problems don’t lie beyond our reach. They exist in our laboratories and universities; in our fields and our factories; in the imaginations of our entrepreneurs and the pride of the hardest-working people on Earth. Those qualities that have made America the greatest force of progress and prosperity in human history we still possess in ample measure. What is required now is for this country to pull together, confront boldly the challenges we face, and take responsibility for our future once more

Now, if we’re honest with ourselves, we’ll admit that for too long, we have not always met these responsibilities – as a government or as a people. I say this not to lay blame or look backwards, but because it is only by understanding how we arrived at this moment that we’ll be able to lift ourselves out of this predicament.

The fact is, our economy did not fall into decline overnight. Nor did all of our problems begin when the housing market collapsed or the stock market sank. We have known for decades that our survival depends on finding new sources of energy. Yet we import more oil today than ever before. The cost of health care eats up more and more of our savings each year, yet we keep delaying reform. Our children will compete for jobs in a global economy that too many of our schools do not prepare them for. And though all these challenges went unsolved, we still managed to spend more money and pile up more debt, both as individuals and through our government, than ever before.

In other words, we have lived through an era where too often, short-term gains were prized over long-term prosperity; where we failed to look beyond the next payment, the next quarter, or the next election. A surplus became an excuse to transfer wealth to the wealthy instead of an opportunity to invest in our future. Regulations were gutted for the sake of a quick profit at the expense of a healthy market. People bought homes they knew they couldn’t afford from banks and lenders who pushed those bad loans anyway. And all the while, critical debates and difficult decisions were put off for some other time on some other day.

Well that day of reckoning has arrived, and the time to take charge of our future is here.

Now is the time to act boldly and wisely – to not only revive this economy, but to build a new foundation for lasting prosperity. Now is the time to jumpstart job creation, re-start lending, and invest in areas like energy, health care, and education that will grow our economy, even as we make hard choices to bring our deficit down. That is what my economic agenda is designed to do, and that’s what I’d like to talk to you about tonight.

It’s an agenda that begins with jobs.

As soon as I took office, I asked this Congress to send me a recovery plan by President’s Day that would put people back to work and put money in their pockets. Not because I believe in bigger government – I don’t. Not because I’m not mindful of the massive debt we’ve inherited – I am. I called for action because the failure to do so would have cost more jobs and caused more hardships. In fact, a failure to act would have worsened our long-term deficit by assuring weak economic growth for years. That’s why I pushed for quick action. And tonight, I am grateful that this Congress delivered, and pleased to say that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is now law.

Over the next two years, this plan will save or create 3.5 million jobs. More than 90% of these jobs will be in the private sector – jobs rebuilding our roads and bridges; constructing wind turbines and solar panels; laying broadband and expanding mass transit.

Because of this plan, there are teachers who can now keep their jobs and educate our kids. Health care professionals can continue caring for our sick. There are 57 police officers who are still on the streets of Minneapolis tonight because this plan prevented the layoffs their department was about to make.

Because of this plan, 95% of the working households in America will receive a tax cut – a tax cut that you will see in your paychecks beginning on April 1st.

Because of this plan, families who are struggling to pay tuition costs will receive a $2,500 tax credit for all four years of college. And Americans who have lost their jobs in this recession will be able to receive extended unemployment benefits and continued health care coverage to help them weather this storm.

I know there are some in this chamber and watching at home who are skeptical of whether this plan will work. I understand that skepticism. Here in Washington, we’ve all seen how quickly good intentions can turn into broken promises and wasteful spending. And with a plan of this scale comes enormous responsibility to get it right.

That is why I have asked Vice President Biden to lead a tough, unprecedented oversight effort – because nobody messes with Joe. I have told each member of my Cabinet as well as mayors and governors across the country that they will be held accountable by me and the American people for every dollar they spend. I have appointed a proven and aggressive Inspector General to ferret out any and all cases of waste and fraud. And we have created a new website called recovery.gov so that every American can find out how and where their money is being spent.

So the recovery plan we passed is the first step in getting our economy back on track. But it is just the first step. Because even if we manage this plan flawlessly, there will be no real recovery unless we clean up the credit crisis that has severely weakened our financial system.

I want to speak plainly and candidly about this issue tonight, because every American should know that it directly affects you and your family’s well-being. You should also know that the money you’ve deposited in banks across the country is safe; your insurance is secure; and you can rely on the continued operation of our financial system. That is not the source of concern.

The concern is that if we do not re-start lending in this country, our recovery will be choked off before it even begins.

You see, the flow of credit is the lifeblood of our economy. The ability to get a loan is how you finance the purchase of everything from a home to a car to a college education; how stores stock their shelves, farms buy equipment, and businesses make payroll.

But credit has stopped flowing the way it should. Too many bad loans from the housing crisis have made their way onto the books of too many banks. With so much debt and so little confidence, these banks are now fearful of lending out any more money to households, to businesses, or to each other. When there is no lending, families can’t afford to buy homes or cars. So businesses are forced to make layoffs. Our economy suffers even more, and credit dries up even further

That is why this administration is moving swiftly and aggressively to break this destructive cycle, restore confidence, and re-start lending.

We will do so in several ways. First, we are creating a new lending fund that represents the largest effort ever to help provide auto loans, college loans, and small business loans to the consumers and entrepreneurs who keep this economy running.

Second, we have launched a housing plan that will help responsible families facing the threat of foreclosure lower their monthly payments and re-finance their mortgages. It’s a plan that won’t help speculators or that neighbor down the street who bought a house he could never hope to afford, but it will help millions of Americans who are struggling with declining home values – Americans who will now be able to take advantage of the lower interest rates that this plan has already helped bring about. In fact, the average family who re-finances today can save nearly $2000 per year on their mortgage.

Third, we will act with the full force of the federal government to ensure that the major banks that Americans depend on have enough confidence and enough money to lend even in more difficult times. And when we learn that a major bank has serious problems, we will hold accountable those responsible, force the necessary adjustments, provide the support to clean up their balance sheets, and assure the continuity of a strong, viable institution that can serve our people and our economy.

I understand that on any given day, Wall Street may be more comforted by an approach that gives banks bailouts with no strings attached, and that holds nobody accountable for their reckless decisions. But such an approach won’t solve the problem. And our goal is to quicken the day when we re-start lending to the American people and American business and end this crisis once and for all.

I intend to hold these banks fully accountable for the assistance they receive, and this time, they will have to clearly demonstrate how taxpayer dollars result in more lending for the American taxpayer. This time, CEOs won’t be able to use taxpayer money to pad their paychecks or buy fancy drapes or disappear on a private jet. Those days are over.

Still, this plan will require significant resources from the federal government – and yes, probably more than we’ve already set aside. But while the cost of action will be great, I can assure you that the cost of inaction will be far greater, for it could result in an economy that sputters along for not months or years, but perhaps a decade. That would be worse for our deficit, worse for business, worse for you, and worse for the next generation. And I refuse to let that happen.

I understand that when the last administration asked this Congress to provide assistance for struggling banks, Democrats and Republicans alike were infuriated by the mismanagement and results that followed. So were the American taxpayers. So was I.

So I know how unpopular it is to be seen as helping banks right now, especially when everyone is suffering in part from their bad decisions. I promise you – I get it.

But I also know that in a time of crisis, we cannot afford to govern out of anger, or yield to the politics of the moment. My job – our job – is to solve the problem. Our job is to govern with a sense of responsibility. I will not spend a single penny for the purpose of rewarding a single Wall Street executive, but I will do whatever it takes to help the small business that can’t pay its workers or the family that has saved and still can’t get a mortgage.

That’s what this is about. It’s not about helping banks – it’s about helping people. Because when credit is available again, that young family can finally buy a new home. And then some company will hire workers to build it. And then those workers will have money to spend, and if they can get a loan too, maybe they’ll finally buy that car, or open their own business. Investors will return to the market, and American families will see their retirement secured once more. Slowly, but surely, confidence will return, and our economy will recover.

So I ask this Congress to join me in doing whatever proves necessary. Because we cannot consign our nation to an open-ended recession. And to ensure that a crisis of this magnitude never happens again, I ask Congress to move quickly on legislation that will finally reform our outdated regulatory system. It is time to put in place tough, new common-sense rules of the road so that our financial market rewards drive and innovation, and punishes short-cuts and abuse.

The recovery plan and the financial stability plan are the immediate steps we’re taking to revive our economy in the short-term. But the only way to fully restore America’s economic strength is to make the long-term investments that will lead to new jobs, new industries, and a renewed ability to compete with the rest of the world. The only way this century will be another American century is if we confront at last the price of our dependence on oil and the high cost of health care; the schools that aren’t preparing our children and the mountain of debt they stand to inherit. That is our responsibility.

In the next few days, I will submit a budget to Congress. So often, we have come to view these documents as simply numbers on a page or laundry lists of programs. I see this document differently. I see it as a vision for America – as a blueprint for our future.

My budget does not attempt to solve every problem or address every issue. It reflects the stark reality of what we’ve inherited – a trillion dollar deficit, a financial crisis, and a costly recession.

Given these realities, everyone in this chamber – Democrats and Republicans – will have to sacrifice some worthy priorities for which there are no dollars. And that includes me.

But that does not mean we can afford to ignore our long-term challenges. I reject the view that says our problems will simply take care of themselves; that says government has no role in laying the foundation for our common prosperity.

For history tells a different story. History reminds us that at every moment of economic upheaval and transformation, this nation has responded with bold action and big ideas. In the midst of civil war, we laid railroad tracks from one coast to another that spurred commerce and industry. From the turmoil of the Industrial Revolution came a system of public high schools that prepared our citizens for a new age. In the wake of war and depression, the GI Bill sent a generation to college and created the largest middle-class in history. And a twilight struggle for freedom led to a nation of highways, an American on the moon, and an explosion of technology that still shapes our world.

In each case, government didn’t supplant private enterprise; it catalyzed private enterprise. It created the conditions for thousands of entrepreneurs and new businesses to adapt and to thrive.

We are a nation that has seen promise amid peril, and claimed opportunity from ordeal. Now we must be that nation again. That is why, even as it cuts back on the programs we don’t need, the budget I submit will invest in the three areas that are absolutely critical to our economic future: energy, health care, and education.

It begins with energy.

We know the country that harnesses the power of clean, renewable energy will lead the 21st century. And yet, it is China that has launched the largest effort in history to make their economy energy efficient. We invented solar technology, but we’ve fallen behind countries like Germany and Japan in producing it. New plug-in hybrids roll off our assembly lines, but they will run on batteries made in Korea.

Well I do not accept a future where the jobs and industries of tomorrow take root beyond our borders – and I know you don’t either. It is time for America to lead again.

Thanks to our recovery plan, we will double this nation’s supply of renewable energy in the next three years. We have also made the largest investment in basic research funding in American history – an investment that will spur not only new discoveries in energy, but breakthroughs in medicine, science, and technology.

We will soon lay down thousands of miles of power lines that can carry new energy to cities and towns across this country. And we will put Americans to work making our homes and buildings more efficient so that we can save billions of dollars on our energy bills.

But to truly transform our economy, protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy. So I ask this Congress to send me legislation that places a market-based cap on carbon pollution and drives the production of more renewable energy in America. And to support that innovation, we will invest fifteen billion dollars a year to develop technologies like wind power and solar power; advanced biofuels, clean coal, and more fuel-efficient cars and trucks built right here in America.

As for our auto industry, everyone recognizes that years of bad decision-making and a global recession have pushed our automakers to the brink. We should not, and will not, protect them from their own bad practices. But we are committed to the goal of a re-tooled, re-imagined auto industry that can compete and win. Millions of jobs depend on it. Scores of communities depend on it. And I believe the nation that invented the automobile cannot walk away from it.

None of this will come without cost, nor will it be easy. But this is America. We don’t do what’s easy. We do what is necessary to move this country forward.

For that same reason, we must also address the crushing cost of health care.

This is a cost that now causes a bankruptcy in America every thirty seconds. By the end of the year, it could cause 1.5 million Americans to lose their homes. In the last eight years, premiums have grown four times faster than wages. And in each of these years, one million more Americans have lost their health insurance. It is one of the major reasons why small businesses close their doors and corporations ship jobs overseas. And it’s one of the largest and fastest-growing parts of our budget.

Given these facts, we can no longer afford to put health care reform on hold.

Already, we have done more to advance the cause of health care reform in the last thirty days than we have in the last decade. When it was days old, this Congress passed a law to provide and protect health insurance for eleven million American children whose parents work full-time. Our recovery plan will invest in electronic health records and new technology that will reduce errors, bring down costs, ensure privacy, and save lives. It will launch a new effort to conquer a disease that has touched the life of nearly every American by seeking a cure for cancer in our time. And it makes the largest investment ever in preventive care, because that is one of the best ways to keep our people healthy and our costs under control.

This budget builds on these reforms. It includes an historic commitment to comprehensive health care reform – a down-payment on the principle that we must have quality, affordable health care for every American. It’s a commitment that’s paid for in part by efficiencies in our system that are long overdue. And it’s a step we must take if we hope to bring down our deficit in the years to come.

Now, there will be many different opinions and ideas about how to achieve reform, and that is why I’m bringing together businesses and workers, doctors and health care providers, Democrats and Republicans to begin work on this issue next week.

I suffer no illusions that this will be an easy process. It will be hard. But I also know that nearly a century after Teddy Roosevelt first called for reform, the cost of our health care has weighed down our economy and the conscience of our nation long enough. So let there be no doubt: health care reform cannot wait, it must not wait, and it will not wait another year.

The third challenge we must address is the urgent need to expand the promise of education in America.

In a global economy where the most valuable skill you can sell is your knowledge, a good education is no longer just a pathway to opportunity – it is a pre-requisite.

Right now, three-quarters of the fastest-growing occupations require more than a high school diploma. And yet, just over half of our citizens have that level of education. We have one of the highest high school dropout rates of any industrialized nation. And half of the students who begin college never finish.

This is a prescription for economic decline, because we know the countries that out-teach us today will out-compete us tomorrow. That is why it will be the goal of this administration to ensure that every child has access to a complete and competitive education – from the day they are born to the day they begin a career.

Already, we have made an historic investment in education through the economic recovery plan. We have dramatically expanded early childhood education and will continue to improve its quality, because we know that the most formative learning comes in those first years of life. We have made college affordable for nearly seven million more students. And we have provided the resources necessary to prevent painful cuts and teacher layoffs that would set back our children’s progress.

But we know that our schools don’t just need more resources. They need more reform. That is why this budget creates new incentives for teacher performance; pathways for advancement, and rewards for success. We’ll invest in innovative programs that are already helping schools meet high standards and close achievement gaps. And we will expand our commitment to charter schools.

It is our responsibility as lawmakers and educators to make this system work. But it is the responsibility of every citizen to participate in it. And so tonight, I ask every American to commit to at least one year or more of higher education or career training. This can be community college or a four-year school; vocational training or an apprenticeship. But whatever the training may be, every American will need to get more than a high school diploma. And dropping out of high school is no longer an option. It’s not just quitting on yourself, it’s quitting on your country – and this country needs and values the talents of every American. That is why we will provide the support necessary for you to complete college and meet a new goal: by 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.

I know that the price of tuition is higher than ever, which is why if you are willing to volunteer in your neighborhood or give back to your community or serve your country, we will make sure that you can afford a higher education. And to encourage a renewed spirit of national service for this and future generations, I ask this Congress to send me the bipartisan legislation that bears the name of Senator Orrin Hatch as well as an American who has never stopped asking what he can do for his country – Senator Edward Kennedy.

These education policies will open the doors of opportunity for our children. But it is up to us to ensure they walk through them. In the end, there is no program or policy that can substitute for a mother or father who will attend those parent/teacher conferences, or help with homework after dinner, or turn off the TV, put away the video games, and read to their child. I speak to you not just as a President, but as a father when I say that responsibility for our children’s education must begin at home.

There is, of course, another responsibility we have to our children. And that is the responsibility to ensure that we do not pass on to them a debt they cannot pay. With the deficit we inherited, the cost of the crisis we face, and the long-term challenges we must meet, it has never been more important to ensure that as our economy recovers, we do what it takes to bring this deficit down.

I’m proud that we passed the recovery plan free of earmarks, and I want to pass a budget next year that ensures that each dollar we spend reflects only our most important national priorities.

Yesterday, I held a fiscal summit where I pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office. My administration has also begun to go line by line through the federal budget in order to eliminate wasteful and ineffective programs. As you can imagine, this is a process that will take some time. But we’re starting with the biggest lines. We have already identified two trillion dollars in savings over the next decade.

In this budget, we will end education programs that don’t work and end direct payments to large agribusinesses that don’t need them. We’ll eliminate the no-bid contracts that have wasted billions in Iraq, and reform our defense budget so that we’re not paying for Cold War-era weapons systems we don’t use. We will root out the waste, fraud, and abuse in our Medicare program that doesn’t make our seniors any healthier, and we will restore a sense of fairness and balance to our tax code by finally ending the tax breaks for corporations that ship our jobs overseas.

In order to save our children from a future of debt, we will also end the tax breaks for the wealthiest 2% of Americans. But let me perfectly clear, because I know you’ll hear the same old claims that rolling back these tax breaks means a massive tax increase on the American people: if your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: not one single dime. In fact, the recovery plan provides a tax cut – that’s right, a tax cut – for 95% of working families. And these checks are on the way.

To preserve our long-term fiscal health, we must also address the growing costs in Medicare and Social Security. Comprehensive health care reform is the best way to strengthen Medicare for years to come. And we must also begin a conversation on how to do the same for Social Security, while creating tax-free universal savings accounts for all Americans.

Finally, because we’re also suffering from a deficit of trust, I am committed to restoring a sense of honesty and accountability to our budget. That is why this budget looks ahead ten years and accounts for spending that was left out under the old rules – and for the first time, that includes the full cost of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. For seven years, we have been a nation at war. No longer will we hide its price.

We are now carefully reviewing our policies in both wars, and I will soon announce a way forward in Iraq that leaves Iraq to its people and responsibly ends this war

And with our friends and allies, we will forge a new and comprehensive strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan to defeat al Qaeda and combat extremism. Because I will not allow terrorists to plot against the American people from safe havens half a world away.

As we meet here tonight, our men and women in uniform stand watch abroad and more are readying to deploy. To each and every one of them, and to the families who bear the quiet burden of their absence, Americans are united in sending one message: we honor your service, we are inspired by your sacrifice, and you have our unyielding support. To relieve the strain on our forces, my budget increases the number of our soldiers and Marines. And to keep our sacred trust with those who serve, we will raise their pay, and give our veterans the expanded health care and benefits that they have earned.

To overcome extremism, we must also be vigilant in upholding the values our troops defend – because there is no force in the world more powerful than the example of America. That is why I have ordered the closing of the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, and will seek swift and certain justice for captured terrorists – because living our values doesn’t make us weaker, it makes us safer and it makes us stronger. And that is why I can stand here tonight and say without exception or equivocation that the United States of America does not torture.

In words and deeds, we are showing the world that a new era of engagement has begun. For we know that America cannot meet the threats of this century alone, but the world cannot meet them without America. We cannot shun the negotiating table, nor ignore the foes or forces that could do us harm. We are instead called to move forward with the sense of confidence and candor that serious times demand.

To seek progress toward a secure and lasting peace between Israel and her neighbors, we have appointed an envoy to sustain our effort. To meet the challenges of the 21st century – from terrorism to nuclear proliferation; from pandemic disease to cyber threats to crushing poverty – we will strengthen old alliances, forge new ones, and use all elements of our national power.

And to respond to an economic crisis that is global in scope, we are working with the nations of the G-20 to restore confidence in our financial system, avoid the possibility of escalating protectionism, and spur demand for American goods in markets across the globe. For the world depends on us to have a strong economy, just as our economy depends on the strength of the world’s.

As we stand at this crossroads of history, the eyes of all people in all nations are once again upon us – watching to see what we do with this moment; waiting for us to lead.

Those of us gathered here tonight have been called to govern in extraordinary times. It is a tremendous burden, but also a great privilege – one that has been entrusted to few generations of Americans. For in our hands lies the ability to shape our world for good or for ill.

I know that it is easy to lose sight of this truth – to become cynical and doubtful; consumed with the petty and the trivial.

But in my life, I have also learned that hope is found in unlikely places; that inspiration often comes not from those with the most power or celebrity, but from the dreams and aspirations of Americans who are anything but ordinary.

I think about Leonard Abess, the bank president from Miami who reportedly cashed out of his company, took a $60 million bonus, and gave it out to all 399 people who worked for him, plus another 72 who used to work for him. He didn’t tell anyone, but when the local newspaper found out, he simply said, ”I knew some of these people since I was 7 years old. I didn’t feel right getting the money myself.”

I think about Greensburg, Kansas, a town that was completely destroyed by a tornado, but is being rebuilt by its residents as a global example of how clean energy can power an entire community – how it can bring jobs and businesses to a place where piles of bricks and rubble once lay. “The tragedy was terrible,” said one of the men who helped them rebuild. “But the folks here know that it also provided an incredible opportunity.”

And I think about Ty’Sheoma Bethea, the young girl from that school I visited in Dillon, South Carolina – a place where the ceilings leak, the paint peels off the walls, and they have to stop teaching six times a day because the train barrels by their classroom. She has been told that her school is hopeless, but the other day after class she went to the public library and typed up a letter to the people sitting in this room. She even asked her principal for the money to buy a stamp. The letter asks us for help, and says, “We are just students trying to become lawyers, doctors, congressmen like yourself and one day president, so we can make a change to not just the state of South Carolina but also the world. We are not quitters.”

We are not quitters.

These words and these stories tell us something about the spirit of the people who sent us here. They tell us that even in the most trying times, amid the most difficult circumstances, there is a generosity, a resilience, a decency, and a determination that perseveres; a willingness to take responsibility for our future and for posterity.

Their resolve must be our inspiration. Their concerns must be our cause. And we must show them and all our people that we are equal to the task before us.

I know that we haven’t agreed on every issue thus far, and there are surely times in the future when we will part ways. But I also know that every American who is sitting here tonight loves this country and wants it to succeed. That must be the starting point for every debate we have in the coming months, and where we return after those debates are done. That is the foundation on which the American people expect us to build common ground.

And if we do – if we come together and lift this nation from the depths of this crisis; if we put our people back to work and restart the engine of our prosperity; if we confront without fear the challenges of our time and summon that enduring spirit of an America that does not quit, then someday years from now our children can tell their children that this was the time when we performed, in the words that are carved into this very chamber, “something worthy to be remembered.” Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America.

And here’s the response to President Obama, delivered by Let Them Eat Cake Caucus Chairman Bobby Jindal:

Good evening. I’m Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana.

Tonight, we witnessed a great moment in the history of our Republic.
In the very chamber where Congress once voted to abolish slavery, our
first African-American President stepped forward to address the state
of our union. With his speech tonight, the President completed a
redemptive journey that took our nation from Independence Hall … to
Gettysburg … to the lunch counter … and now, finally, the Oval Office.

Regardless of party, all Americans are moved by the President’s
personal story – the son of an American mother and a Kenyan father,
who grew up to become leader of the free world. Like the President’s
father, my parents came to this country from a distant land. When
they arrived in Baton Rouge, my mother was already 4 ½ months
pregnant. I was what folks in the insurance industry now call a
‘pre-existing condition.’ To find work, my dad picked up the yellow
pages and started calling local businesses. Even after landing a job,
he could still not afford to pay for my delivery – so he worked out an
installment plan with the doctor. Fortunately for me, he never missed
a payment.

As I grew up, my mom and dad taught me the values that attracted them
to this country – and they instilled in me an immigrant’s wonder at
the greatness of America. As a child, I remember going to the
grocery store with my dad. Growing up in India, he had seen extreme
poverty. And as we walked through the aisles, looking at the endless
variety on the shelves, he would tell me: ‘Bobby, Americans can do
anything.’ I still believe that to this day. Americans can do
anything. When we pull together, there is no challenge we cannot
overcome.

As the President made clear this evening, we are now in a time of
challenge. Many of you listening tonight have lost jobs. Others
have seen your college and retirement savings dwindle. Many of you
are worried about losing your health care and your homes. And you are
looking to your elected leaders in Washington for solutions.

Republicans are ready to work with the new President to provide those
solutions. Here in my state of Louisiana, we don’t care what party
you belong to if you have good ideas to make life better for our
people. We need more of that attitude from both Democrats and
Republicans in our nation’s capital. All of us want our economy to
recover and our nation to prosper. So where we agree, Republicans
must be the President’s strongest partners. And where we disagree,
Republicans have a responsibility to be candid and offer better ideas
for a path forward.

Today in Washington, some are promising that government will rescue us
from the economic storms raging all around us.

Those of us who lived through Hurricane Katrina, we have our doubts.

Let me tell you a story.

During Katrina, I visited Sheriff Harry Lee, a Democrat and a good
friend of mine. When I walked into his makeshift office I’d never
seen him so angry. He was yelling into the phone: ‘Well, I’m the
Sheriff and if you don’t like it you can come and arrest me!’ I asked
him: ‘Sheriff, what’s got you so mad?’ He told me that he had put out
a call for volunteers to come with their boats to rescue people who
were trapped on their rooftops by the floodwaters. The boats were
all lined up ready to go – when some bureaucrat showed up and told
them they couldn’t go out on the water unless they had proof of
insurance and registration. I told him, ‘Sheriff, that’s ridiculous.’
And before I knew it, he was yelling into the phone: ‘Congressman
Jindal is here, and he says you can come and arrest him too!’ Harry
just told the boaters to ignore the bureaucrats and start rescuing
people.

There is a lesson in this experience: The strength of America is not
found in our government. It is found in the compassionate hearts and
enterprising spirit of our citizens. We are grateful for the support
we have received from across the nation for the ongoing recovery
efforts. This spirit got Louisiana through the hurricanes – and this
spirit will get our nation through the storms we face today.

To solve our current problems, Washington must lead. But the way to
lead is not to raise taxes and put more money and power in hands of
Washington politicians. The way to lead is by empowering you – the
American people. Because we believe that Americans can do anything.

That is why Republicans put forward plans to create jobs by lowering
income tax rates for working families … cutting taxes for small
businesses … strengthening incentives for businesses to invest in new
equipment and hire new workers … and stabilizing home values by
creating a new tax credit for home-buyers. These plans would cost
less and create more jobs.

But Democratic leaders in Congress rejected this approach. Instead of
trusting us to make wise decisions with our own money, they passed the
largest government spending bill in history – with a price tag of more
than $1 trillion with interest. While some of the projects in the
bill make sense, their legislation is larded with wasteful spending.
It includes $300 million to buy new cars for the government, $8
billion for high-speed rail projects, such as a ‘magnetic levitation’
line from Las Vegas to Disneyland, and $140 million for something
called ‘volcano monitoring.’ Instead of monitoring volcanoes, what
Congress should be monitoring is the eruption of spending in
Washington, DC.

Democratic leaders say their legislation will grow the economy. What
it will do is grow the government, increase our taxes down the line,
and saddle future generations with debt. Who among us would ask our
children for a loan, so we could spend money we do not have, on things
we do not need? That is precisely what the Democrats in Congress just
did. It’s irresponsible. And it’s no way to strengthen our economy,
create jobs, or build a prosperous future for our children.

In Louisiana, we took a different approach. Since I became governor,
we cut more than 250 earmarks from our state budget. And to create
jobs for our citizens, we cut taxes six times – including the largest
income tax cut in the history of our state. We passed those tax cuts
with bipartisan majorities. Republicans and Democrats put aside
their differences, and worked together to make sure our people could
keep more of what they earn. If it can be done in Baton Rouge, surely
it can be done in Washington, DC.

To strengthen our economy, we need urgent action to keep energy prices
down. All of us remember what it felt like to pay $4 at the pump -
and unless we act now, those prices will return. To stop that from
happening, we need to increase conservation … increase energy
efficiency … increase the use of alternative and renewable fuels …
increase our use of nuclear power – and increase drilling for oil and
gas here at home. We believe that Americans can do anything – and if
we unleash the innovative spirit of our citizens, we can achieve
energy independence.

To strengthen our economy, we also need to address the crisis in
health care. Republicans believe in a simple principle: No American
should have to worry about losing their health coverage – period. We
stand for universal access to affordable health care coverage. We
oppose universal government-run health care. Health care decisions
should be made by doctors and patients – not by government
bureaucrats. We believe Americans can do anything – and if we put
aside partisan politics and work together, we can make our system of
private medicine affordable and accessible for every one of our
citizens.

To strengthen our economy, we also need to make sure every child in
America gets the best possible education. After Katrina, we
reinvented the New Orleans school system – opening dozens of new
charter schools, and creating a new scholarship program that is giving
parents the chance to send their children to private or parochial
schools of their choice. We believe that, with the proper education,
the children of America can do anything. And it should not take a
devastating storm to bring this kind of innovation to education in our
country.

To strengthen our economy, we must promote confidence in America by
ensuring ours is the most ethical and transparent system in the world.
In my home state, there used to be saying: At any given time, half
of Louisiana is under water – and the other half is under indictment.
No one says that anymore. Last year, we passed some of the
strongest ethics laws in the nation – and today, Louisiana has turned
her back on the corruption of the past. We need to bring
transparency to Washington, DC – so we can rid our Capitol of
corruption … and ensure we never see the passage of another trillion
dollar spending bill that Congress has not even read and the American
people haven’t even seen.

As we take these steps, we must remember for all our troubles at home,
dangerous enemies still seek our destruction. Now is no time to
dismantle the defenses that have protected this country for hundreds
of years, or make deep cuts in funding for our troops. America’s
fighting men and women can do anything. And if we give them the
resources they need, they will stay on the offensive … defeat our
enemies … and protect us from harm.

In all these areas, Republicans want to work with President Obama. We
appreciate his message of hope – but sometimes it seems we look for
hope in different places. Democratic leaders in Washington place
their hope in the federal government. We place our hope in you – the
American people. In the end, it comes down to an honest and
fundamental disagreement about the proper role of government. We
oppose the National Democrats’ view that says — the way to strengthen
our country is to increase dependence on government. We believe the
way to strengthen our country is to restrain spending in Washington,
and empower individuals and small businesses to grow our economy and
create jobs.

In recent years, these distinctions in philosophy became less clear -
because our party got away from its principles. You elected
Republicans to champion limited government, fiscal discipline, and
personal responsibility. Instead, Republicans went along with
earmarks and big government spending in Washington. Republicans lost
your trust – and rightly so.

Tonight, on behalf of our leaders in Congress and my fellow Republican
governors, I say: Our party is determined to regain your trust. We
will do so by standing up for the principles that we share … the
principles you elected us to fight for … the principles that built
this into the greatest, most prosperous country on earth.

A few weeks ago, the President warned that our nation is facing a
crisis that he said ‘we may not be able to reverse.’ Our troubles are
real, to be sure. But don’t let anyone tell you that we cannot
recover – or that America’s best days are behind her. This is the
nation that cast off the scourge of slavery … overcame the Great
Depression … prevailed in two World Wars … won the struggle for civil
rights … defeated the Soviet menace … and responded with determined
courage to the attacks of September 11, 2001. The American spirit
has triumphed over almost every form of adversity known to man – and
the American spirit will triumph again.

We can have confidence in our future – because, amid today’s
challenges, we also count many blessings: We have the most innovative
citizens …the most abundant resources … the most resilient economy …
the most powerful military … and the freest political system in the
history of the world. My fellow citizens, never forget: We are
Americans. And like my dad said years ago, Americans can do anything.

Thank you for listening. God bless you. And God bless America.”

Comments Off


No (More) Taxation Without Representation

Legislation granting the District of Columbia a voting member in the House of Representatives passed a cloture vote in the Senate today, 62 to 34. In order to preserve the current partisan balance of the House, the bill also gives another Representative to Utah, which just fell short of receiving an extra Representative in the last census.  Thus, the House of Representatives would expand to 437 members, the first such increase in more than 100 years.

Giving DC full voting rights is hugely important to our democracy.  Nearly 600,000 tax-paying American citizens live in the District of Columbia–a city more populous than the entire state of Wyoming–yet they only have a single non-voting delegate to speak for them in Congress.  Our nation was founded on the idea that citizens have the right to be represented in their government, and the legal status of DC has been a black stain on our democracy.

Some people are saying that giving DC a voting representative would be unconstitutional.  That’s right–they’re arguing that giving tax-paying American citizens representation in Congress violates the Constitution.  Needless to say, I find that somewhat counter-intuitive.

Let’s get down to the legal nitty-gritty: here’s what the Constitution says about House representation:

ARTICLE I.

SECTION 2.

CLAUSE 1: The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.

So it’s saying that the House will be composed of members elected every other year by the citizens of the states. The sticking point here seems to be that DC isn’t a state, but I think the argument really comes down to what the word “member” means.

Right now, DC, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands elect non-voting delegates to the House. Are delegates members? Would they become members if they receive full voting rights? What determines who is or is not a member of the House of Representatives?

That distinction might be one that the courts have to draw, but ambiguity over the definition of “member” shouldn’t in and of itself disqualify this legislation.

Others opposed to this plan are pulling out the slippery-slope argument–they say that, if we grant DC voting rights, what’s to stop Puerto Rico or Guam or any other American territory from doing the same?

Well, what separates DC from the American territories is taxes–DC residents pay American federal taxes, while the inhabitants of American territories don’t. That’s why DC is entitled to Congressional representation–Congress determines how much DC residents pay in taxes, and “no taxation without representation” was the rallying cry that underlined the founding of our great nation.

Comments Off


Missouri Loves Company

Former Missouri State Treasurer–and failed 2008 Gubernatorial candidate–Sarah Steelman will challenge former House Minority Whip Roy Blunt for  MO’s open Senate seat in 2010:

“I’m in the process of laying the groundwork that I need to get done before making an official announcement,” Steelman told POLITICO. “I’m definitely strongly leaning towards doing this.”

[...]

In the interview, Steelman took some sharp jabs at Blunt, describing the seven-term congressman Blunt as being part of the “old-boys’ network” who has spent too much time in Washington.

Roy Blunt is another white guy in a suit, and I think the public wants change,” Steelman said. “There’s a good old boys’ network out there that’s hard to penetrate… and it’s not always in the best interest of the party or for conservative principles.”

[...]

In an interview with the St. Louis-Dispatch, Blunt flatly said that “Steelman can’t win the primary.”

I smell a bruising primary fight.

Blunt is part of the failed GOP establishment–he was the interim Majority Leader after Tom DeLay’s resignation and served as the #2 Republican in the House during the 110th Congress. In addition, his son Matt served an unremarkable term as Missouri’s Governor.

But Steelman’s record leaves a bit to be desired.  She served one term as the State Treasurer before losing the Republican Gubernatorial primary to Kenny Hulshof, who went on to lose to Democrat Jay Nixon in the general election.

Personally, I think Steelman would be a better bet if for no other reason than all of the political baggage Blunt brings into the race.  No matter what, though, it looks like there’s a bloody primary fight brewing, which could very well cripple the GOP’s shot at holding onto this seat.



America To The GOP: Drop Dead

The political results of the stimulus package fight are in, and it looks like Obama and the Democrats are the winners while the Republicans–as always–are the losers:

Obama’s overall approval rating: 67% APPROVE / 24% DISAPPROVE

Obama’s approval rating on handling the economy: 68% APPROVE / 27% DISAPPROVE

Economic stimulus package approval rating: 52% APPROVE / 41% DISAPPROVE

Confidence that the stimulus package will improve the economy: 54% CONFIDENT / 45% NOT CONFIDENT

Congressional Democrats’ approval rating: 49% APPROVE / 45% DISAPPROVE

Congressional Republicans’ approval rating: 33% APPROVE / 59% DISAPPROVE

Has Obama cooperated enough with Republicans: 62% RIGHT AMOUNT / 30% NOT ENOUGH 6%  TOO MUCH

Have Republicans cooperated enough with Obama: 27% RIGHT AMOUNT / 64% NOT ENOUGH / 5% TOO MUCH

So, according to the American people:

  • Obama is doing a good job, particularly on the economy.
  • The economic stimulus package was a good idea.
  • The economic stimulus package will help the economy.
  • Congressional Democrats did a good job on the stimulus package.
  • Congressional Republicans did a poor job on the stimulus package.
  • Obama worked with Republicans enough but Republicans didn’t work with Obama enough.

The GOP’s opposition to Obama and the stimulus was supposed to be their ticket back into the majority, but it looks like it’s turning into a ticket for a one-way ride on the failboat.

Comments Off


Is The Future Still Cao?

Rep. Anh “Joseph” Cao–the Republican who beat scandal-plagued Congressman William Jefferson last fall–stood with his Republican brethren in voting against the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, despite his pledge to support it .  As Cao said at the time:

“I’m voting along what my conscience dictates and the needs of the 2nd Congressional District dictate, even if I were to be the only member of the GOP to vote for the stimulus package…I believe that more likely than not, I will vote for it because the 2nd Congressional District needs a stimulus package.”

Needless to say, that was a pretty glaring piece of hypocritical flip-floppery. And, as it turn out, Cao’s constituents don’t appreciate his lie or his vote:

Papers have been filed with the Office of the Louisiana Secretary of State which started the process requiring sufficient signatures to force a recall election for the office held by Representative Cao.

Cao represents a majority African American community many who were outraged by Cao’s vote. Cao made national news with his victory over Bill Jefferson.

[...]

The group of ministers who filed the petition want to make sure that he faces a recall which could be a very daunting act, if not impossible act in Louisiana based upon the state’s history.

No, I don’t think it will succeed.  And I think it’s pretty moot since Cao probably won’t get re-elected, anyway. But I think Republicans should have to pay a political price for opposing economic recovery, especially when their own constituents are in desperate need of help.

Comments Off


Unity

Markos Moulitsas comments on our woefully out-of-touch political press:

You’d think that the Beltway conventional wisdom would reflect the simple reality revealed in the polling: the stimulus legislation was overwhelmingly popular, Obama and congressional Democrats benefited politically from passing it, and Republicans are being punished by popular sentiment for opposing it. Alas, D.C. is located in an entirely different dimension from the real world.

MSNBC’s First Read declared the Republicans winners, because the party “demonstrated unity after its big losses in November.” The Associated Press’s Liz Sidoti risibly wrote, “Adrift after back-to-back electoral losses, they found their voice against a Democratic Speaker and an expanded majority … as they led the effort to define the package as too costly and too quick.” The propagandists at Fox News echoed those sentiments: “Republican lawmakers may turn out to be winners. Most of them voted against the package, and in their largely unified opposition, they found an issue to galvanize the party.”

The problem with the Republican Party isn’t a lack of unity. Conversely, finding unity isn’t going to save the Republican Party. In fact, if anything, the GOP was hurt because they were too unified behind bad policies.

That’s the GOP’s problem–they have bad polices, they have bad ideas. It doesn’t matter how unified they are or aren’t; unifying behind bad ideas is always bad policy.

Did people vote against the GOP in 2006 and 2008 because they were disorganized? No, they voted against the GOP was because Republicans had spent years implementing really poor policies that had disastrous effects.

Lining up behind a bad idea wasn’t a victory for the GOP; in fact, it was the same kind of politics-as-usual that got us into this economic mess to begin with.

But I guess that’s the Republican Party for you: working hard to solve problems nobody had.

Comments Off


The Out-Of-Touch GOP (UPDATED)

Republican Governors, who have to deal with the effects of the economic crisis in their states, are lining up to support the economic stimulus package:

In the states, meanwhile, many Republican governors are practicing a pragmatic — their Congressional counterparts would say less-principled — conservatism.

Governors, unlike members of Congress, have to balance their budgets each year. And that requires compromise with state legislators, including Democrats, as well as more openness to the occasional state tax increase and to deficit-spending from Washington.

Across the country, from California’s Arnold Schwarzenegger to Florida’s Charlie Crist and New England’s Jim Douglas in Vermont and M. Jodi Rell in Connecticut, Republican governors showed in the stimulus debate that they could be allies with Mr. Obama even as Congressional Republicans spurned him.

“It really is a matter of perspective,” Mr. Crist said in an interview. “As a governor, the pragmatism that you have to exercise because of the constitutional obligation to balance your budget is a very compelling pull” generally.

Republican Governors have to pass balanced budgets every year, so a bad economy means they have to cut spending in order to make up for a poorly-performing economy. Because of that, they’re supporting the stimulus package. Meanwhile, national Republicans–who are largely insulated from having to face the direct effects of a bad economy–oppose it. In fact, they’re patting themselves on the back for how strongly they opposed the stimulus package.

The Democratic Party supports the stimulus package. The President and the White House support the stimulus package. The American people support the stimulus package. Republican Governors support it. It’s just the national Republican Party and the far-right conservative movement who oppose it; does anyone need any more proof of just how out-of-touch the GOP is with the needs of the people?

UPDATE: Maybe I should change the title of this post to “The Hypocritical GOP” in light of this:

House Republicans, as a group, may take great pride in the goose egg they offered President Obama’s stimulus package. But now the unanimous opposition is struggling to bring that money home.

[...]

Back in his home district, Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) found some nice things to say about the plan.

[...]

Rep. Don Young (R-AK) put out a press release saying that he “won a victory for the Alaska Native contracting program and other Alaska small business owners last night in H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.”

[...]

“All along he has believed infrastructure spending, in particular, should provide a boost to the Inland Empire’s economy,” a spokesman to Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA) said.

“While we philosophically have different opinions, we’re obligated to make sure this money is spent properly,” said Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA). “All of us in the Inland Empire will do what we can to direct as much money as we can.”

[...]

Think Progress finds a press release from Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) along the same lines

Remember, all those gentlemen voted against the stimulus package. Yet, none of them mind taking the money from the package and none of them mind bragging about the good it will do for their districts.

The hypocrisy at work here is astounding.  Republicans want credit for the jobs the stimulus package will create but don’t want to bear the responsibility of actually voting for it and having that vote on their records.



OH-SEN: Brunner & Fisher In

Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner will run for Ohio’s open Senate seat in 2010:

Democrats have their first candidate in the Ohio Senate race to succeed retiring GOP Sen. George Voinovich.

Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner will announce that she’s running, according to a senior Ohio Democratic operative. She will declare her candidacy in a statement to be released this afternoon.

If elected, Brunner would become the first woman elected to the Senate from Ohio.

Brunner will be receiving the endorsement of the women’s group EMILY’s List, which will help her raise the millions necessary for a statewide campaign.

Brunner will face a primary challenger in Ohio’s Lieutenant Governor, Lee Fisher, who has also announced his candidacy for Senate:

Fisher will be making his announcement this evening at the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus with Gov. Ted Strickland by his side. Strickland will be endorsing Fisher — high-profile backing that will test his own political clout heading into the 2010 election.

Fisher had earlier formed an exploratory committee to begin raising money for the campaign.

The primary will set up a clash between two of the party’s leading statewide officials in the race to succeed Sen. George Voinovich, the two-term Republican who recently announced he would not seek reelection in 2010.

Fisher will also pick up the endorsement of Rep. Tim Ryan.

Whoever wins the primary will face likely Republican candidate–and former Bush administration official–Rob Portman.

I don’t know why the OH GOP thinks running a Bush protege is a good idea, but I certainly won’t stand in the way of them handing the Democrats their 60th Senate seat.

Comments Off


BREAKING: Stimulus Package Passes House (UPDATED)

GOP to America: Drop Dead

The economic stimulus package just passed through the House of Representatives, once again without a single Republican vote.

The final tally was 246 to 183. Despite all the changes made to make to the final version of this bill, it gained only 2 “yes” votes and lost only 5 “no” votes compared to the last version.

And for every day that the GOP stalled and deliberated and dragged their feet, America lost 20,000 jobs. How many hundreds of thousands of jobs did America lose while the GOP strung us along, letting us believe that they could be won over?

What was the point of all this negotiation? Why did President Obama and the Democrats bend over backwards to make concession after concession? The Democrats busted their backs to be bipartisan just to have sand kicked in their faces by the GOP. I’m all for bipartisanship, but when one side refuses to participate then bipartisanship is impossible.

Today, the GOP signaled that they could care less about the state of our economy, and that anyone who does care about the economy doesn’t belong in the GOP. Between this insult and the Judd Gregg flap, President Obama and the Democrats should no longer be expected to seek bipartisanship. Until the Republicans prove to us that they’re once again a serious political party, they should be relegated to the sidelines of our politics and included as little as possible. I hate to say that–I support a strong two-party system with checks and balances–but right now the costs are too high (and the rewards are too little) to make maintaining that system worthwhile.

UPDATE: And let’s not forget how out of touch the GOP is–every single one of them opposed this bill, while the American people support it:

GALLUP

[2/11] 59% FAVOR / 33% OPPOSE

PEW

[2/8] 51% GOOD IDEA / 34% BAD IDEA

CNN/ORC

[2/8] 54% FAVOR / 45% OPPOSE

GALLUP

[2/5] 52% FAVOR / 38% OPPOSE

CBS NEWS

[2/4] 51% APPROVE / 39% DISAPPROVE

GALLUP

[1/28] 52% FAVOR / 37% OPPOSE

DIAGEO/HOTLINE

[1/24] 54% SUPPORT / 34% OPPOSE

Comments Off


The Wisdom Of Dan Boren (?-OK)

Dan Boren, Oklahoma Democrat in Congress, mulls over the economic stimulus package:

Boren said Obama “missed an opportunity” for the stimulus bill to be bipartisan.

“It was a good thing for the president to meet with Republicans. The previous administration never met with Democratic members of Congress.

“The problem is that it became a Democrat [sic] bill and not an American bill,” Boren continued, “because he didn’t use any of the Republican ideas.”

First off, I’m not even going to touch the fact that Boren draws a distinction between “Democrat” and “American.”

Second, one-third of the entire economic stimulus package is devoted solely to tax cuts–the same tax cuts Republicans were demanding be included.  Boren’s complaint that “[Obama] didn’t use any of the Republican ideas” is just absurd, since a third of the whole bill is based entirely on their ideas.  And that’s not even mentioning the various expenditures Republicans objected to, resulting in Obama removing them from the package.

The President met personally with Congressional Republicans.  He listened to their ideas.  He based one-third of the entire stimulus bill on those ideas. And he removed a host of expenditures Republicans objected to, all in an effort to make the bill more appealing to them. Yet, in the end, only 3 out of 219 Congressional Republicans voted for the stimulus package.

But, according to Dan Boren, Obama was being partisan, not the Republicans. How absurd is that?

If we replaced Dan Boren with a Republican, would anyone notice? I don’t think they would. Hell, maybe Boren should fulfill his bipartisan fantasies by just switching sides already–then he can become a burden on the Republican Party.

Comments Off


America Supports The Stimulus

Despite the Republican rhetoric on the economic stimulus package, poll after poll from a variety of polling outfits show nearly identical results: a majority of the American people support the plan, while about a third oppose it, since at least late January:

GALLUP

[2/11] 59% FAVOR / 33% OPPOSE

PEW

[2/8] 51% GOOD IDEA / 34% BAD IDEA

CNN/ORC

[2/8] 54% FAVOR / 45% OPPOSE

GALLUP

[2/5] 52% FAVOR / 38% OPPOSE

CBS NEWS

[2/4] 51% APPROVE / 39% DISAPPROVE

GALLUP

[1/28] 52% FAVOR / 37% OPPOSE

DIAGEO/HOTLINE

[1/24] 54% SUPPORT / 34% OPPOSE

Well, that’s the case for nearly every polling outfit except Rasmussen:

RASMUSSEN

[2/12] 44% SUPPORT / 40% OPPOSE

[2/4] 37% FAVOR / 43% OPPOSE

[1/29] 42% SUPPORT / 39% OPPOSE

Rasmussen’s polls–at least on this issue–are clearly outliers. He constantly undersamples stimulus support and oversamples stimulus opposition. There are only two conclusions to be drawn here: either everyone else is wrong or Scott Rasmussen is not a reliable pollster.

The way his polls skew isn’t surprising–according to the Center for Public Integrity, Rasmussen received nearly $150,000 from the RNC and the Bush-Cheney ‘04 campaign. Normally I wouldn’t shoot the messenger on something like this–pollsters have to earn a living somehow–but when your polls produce idiosyncratic results that just happen to serve the political interests of your clients, well, that’s cause for some alarm.

Polls don’t just measure public support, they often play a role in forming it. If you look at conservative blog coverage of the stimulus package you’ll find Rasmussen’s polls quoted all over the place while other polls with contradictory results are ignored. It looks like there’s an effort underway to claim–falsely–that the American people don’t support the stimulus.

Plus, Rasmussen has put out some bizarre surveys like this one:

When it comes to the nation’s economic issues, 67% of U.S. voters have more confidence in their own judgment than they do in the average member of Congress.

[...]

Forty-four percent (44%) voters also think a group of people selected at random from the phone book would do a better job addressing the nation’s problems than the current Congress

[...]

Fifty-eight percent (58%) agree, too, that “no matter how bad things are, Congress can always find a way to make them worse.”

This is dangerously close to push-polling. Plus, it doesn’t say anything about whether people actually support the stimulus package. Thinking you could do a better job than your Congressman (who doesn’t think that) or that Congress “can always find a way to make [things] worse” doesn’t tell us if you support or oppose the legislation before Congress.

What that poll does is imply what the opinions of it’s respondents are without ever just asking them outright, which raises a number of red flags in my mind.

Rasmussen’s polls are outliers. By every reasonable measure, the American people support the economic stimulus package, and do so by anywhere from 10% to 20%. As much as conservatives would like to twist the very fabric of reality to change that one simple fact, the truth cannot be buried, not even by an avalanche of untrustworthy, partisan polls.

Comments Off


“The Future Is Cao!”

Something tells me the GOP won’t be singing that tune anymore:

U.S. Rep. Anh “Joseph” Cao, R-New Orleans, said Wednesday he is likely to vote for the economic stimulus bill when it comes to a vote, probably today or Friday, even if he is the only Republican member of the House to do so.

“I’m voting along what my conscience dictates and the needs of the 2nd Congressional District dictate, even if I were to be the only member of the GOP to vote for the stimulus package,” he said.

“Even though it is going to be a humongous bill, even though we will be in debt for years, I believe that more likely than not, I will vote for it because the 2nd Congressional District needs a stimulus package.”

More power to him.  I still think Cao will be defeated in 2010, but I certainly hopes he turns out to be a reasonable Congressman until then.

Comments Off


BREAKING: Stimulus Deal Reached (UPDATED)

The Washington Post reports that Congressional Democrats and Republicans have crafted a final version of the economic stimulus package:

House and Senate negotiators reached agreement today on a stimulus plan with a cost of about $789 billion after scaling down the versions passed by both houses, congressional leaders announced.

[...]

[Majority Leader Harry Reid] said the final version “creates more jobs than the original Senate bill and spends less than the original House bill.” The bill passed by the Senate yesterday totaled $838 billion. The House version approved last week had a price tag of $819 billion.

Reid said the bill would create 3.5 million jobs and fulfill President Obama’s pledge to cut taxes for 95 percent of American families. He said the final bill would be put to a vote on the Senate floor “in the next few days, maybe as early as tomorrow.”

“This has been a give and take,” Reid said, adding that “the House is part of this arrangement.”

If Reid’s assessment is accurate then I’m happy with the legislation; I still worry that the bill isn’t big enough and contains a lot of the wrong kind of spending, but this bill is necessary for our economic recovery.

Of course, now I’m interested in which Republicans will change their minds and vote for the final stimulus package. The difference between the prior version and the final version is $49 billion; I wonder if that will really be the line between Republicans voting to save our economy and Republicans obstructing economic recovery.

UPDATE: I agree with Ben Smith’s take on this:

My first instinct is that, despite some handwringing, it’s hard not to see this as a pretty clean win for the president. During the transition Obama called for a stimulus package in that ballpark, and said he hoped to get it through by first week in February.

It’s February 11, just a few days late, and he appears to have more or less what he wanted. He’s now going to get credit for massive spending on thousands of popular projects, further enhancing his political capital, at least for now.

He, and the plan, will be judged on the larger course of the economy. But this deal appears to leave a strong president even stronger.

Comments Off


The Things Republicans Say, Part 2

If this keeps up I’m going to have to start a series:

U.S. Rep. Steve Austria said he supports a scaled-down federal economic-stimulus proposal, but the Beavercreek Republican told The Dispatch editorial board that the huge influx of money into the economy could have a negative effect.

“When (President Franklin) Roosevelt did this, he put our country into a Great Depression,” Austria said. “He tried to borrow and spend, he tried to use the Keynesian approach, and our country ended up in a Great Depression. That’s just history.”

Most historians date the beginning of the Great Depression at or shortly after the stock-market crash of 1929; Roosevelt took office in 1933.

[Emphasis mine]

Normally I’d say that Minority Leader John Boehner should go talk some sense into Rep. Austria, but I’m not all that sure that Boehner isn’t taking advice from him, especially considering how House Republicans handled the economic stimulus package.

Comments Off


20,000

The unemployment rate has jumped to 7.6%. America lost 598,000 jobs in January alone. 98% of American cities saw their unemployment increase in December. Needless to say, our economy is in trouble.

There is a job creation bill in Congress that would create anywhere from 1.2 to 3.9 million new jobs over the next few years. Yet, the Republicans are holding that bill up because they disagree with just 2% of it. That’s right–apparently supporting 98% of a piece of legislation isn’t enough to get Republicans to vote for it.

And what’s the GOP’s latest talking point in the debate over the stimulus bill? “Why the hurry?” That’s right–our economy is crumbling all around us but the GOP is content to sit back, kick up their heels and drag this process out for as long as they want.

According to January’s job loss figures, we’re losing nearly 20,000 jobs a day. Every day the GOP drags their feet, every day they waste on gimmicks like making charts explaining how high a pile of $1 trillion dollars goes or stuffing more tax cuts into the stimulus bill or pimping their own plan (which happens to be devoid of actual economic stimulus), America loses 20,000 more jobs.

Today, while the GOP withheld their votes in the hopes of getting more pro-corporate goodies into the bill, 20,000 Americans lost their jobs. And since it’s a Friday, Congress won’t be able to consider the bill until Monday, ensuring 40,000 Americans will lose their jobs over the weekend. And even if the Senate manages to pass the bill on Monday, that will be after another 20,000 lost jobs before this bill becomes law.

What’s the hurry? How about the tens of thousands of Americans losing their jobs every day? Is that a big enough problem to get the GOP to act, or have they just stopped caring at this point? Maybe we should have Republican Senators and Congressman go explain to the newly-unemployed people in their districts why it was necessary to sacrifice their jobs for the sake of a capital gains tax cut or a corporate income rate tax cut. That should win them a lot of votes come 2010.

Republicans fiddle while the economy burns. How many more jobs do we have to lose before they budge?